Conservation of Energy/Gravitational Potential Energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem involving the conservation of energy and gravitational potential energy. The scenario involves two buckets connected by a pulley, with one bucket at ground level and the other 2.00 m above. The initial attempt calculated the speed of the second bucket at impact as 5.11 m/s, but the correct answer is 4.4 m/s, as indicated by the textbook. The error was identified as neglecting the kinetic energy of both buckets in the energy conservation equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of energy principles
  • Familiarity with gravitational potential energy (Ug = mgh)
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy formula (K = 1/2 mv²)
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the conservation of energy in mechanical systems
  • Study the implications of kinetic energy in pulley systems
  • Explore energy loss due to friction in real-world applications
  • Practice similar problems involving multiple objects and pulleys
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding energy conservation in dynamic systems.

Dougggggg
Messages
152
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There are 2 buckets hanging from a single pulley with rope (not considering the mass) that connects them. One is on the ground and has a mass of 4.0 kg, the second is 2.00 m above the ground when released. Using conservation of energy, find the speed of the second bucket when it hits the ground.


Homework Equations


K1+U1-Wother=K2+U2

Ug=mgh

K=[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]mv2


The Attempt at a Solution


I put K1 and U2 equal to 0 and made Wother equal to m1gh. Then just solved for v by multiplying by 2/m2 and square rooting.

PHY2110755.jpg


I got 5.11 m/s but the book says 4.4 m/s. Anyone know where I messed up or what I'm not accounting for?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Dougggggg! :smile:

Both buckets have KE. :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Dougggggg! :smile:

Both buckets have KE. :wink:

So I would set it equal to a second K on the right side of the equation? I will try it out and edit when I have solved.

Awesome, worked perfectly, thanks.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K