Conservation of Energy,pendulum question

  • Thread starter Thread starter missileblitz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conservation
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 5K views
missileblitz
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A pendulum consists of a mass on a 50 cm long string. It is being held stationary at a 30°angle with the vertical. After release, how fast will it be going at the bottom? (Hint: Use trigonometry to find how high the ball is initally)


Homework Equations



Ek = 1/2mv^2 for sure to find the velocity
Eg = mgh


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm basically brain-dead on this question, I don't know where to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a diagram first, that always helps.

Hint: Trigonometry, you're going to have to consider cos of the angle in this situation. It's like a force, you need to consider the vertical component of the string. In forces that would be the vertical force, but here it's the length.
 
Last edited:
Yes, draw a diagram with both the initial position and the final postion(bottom-most).
Then find the height difference between the two positions. It will be a function of the angle.
And then apply energy conservation.
 
So basically I've had a go on the question with the help of the previous posts:
[PLAIN]http://img532.imageshack.us/img532/6052/physicsi.png

So to find the left side of the triangle (lets say n):

50 x cos30 = n
n = 43.3

The string is 50cm
50 - 43.3 = 6.70 cm
x = 6.70cm
=0.0670m

Since Ep @ top = Ek @ bottom
m x 9.80 x 0.0670 = 1/2mv^2, m's cancel out I think?

0.6566 = 1/2v^2
sqrt 1.3132 = sqrt v^2
1.15 m/s = v

I'm not sure about the significant digits, but this is how I tried to solve the question, can anyone confirm the answer?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Assuming your arithmetic is all correct that looks to be correct, and yes for this relationship your mass is negligible.

Joe