Conservation of mechanical energy This is simple but I am puzzledNeed help

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conservation of mechanical energy in a collision between two equal mass balls on a frictionless slope. Ball A rolls down and collides with stationary Ball B, resulting in both balls moving together to a maximum height. The book states the maximum height attained is 0.25m, while the original poster calculated it as 0.5m. The discrepancy arises because energy is conserved in terms of momentum during the collision, leading to a halving of velocity and thus kinetic energy, which the book correctly accounts for in its calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE)
  • Knowledge of conservation of momentum principles
  • Familiarity with basic physics equations related to energy and motion
  • Ability to analyze collisions in a frictionless environment
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of conservation of momentum in elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Learn about energy transformations during collisions
  • Explore the concept of kinetic energy and its dependence on velocity
  • Review examples of mechanical energy conservation in various physical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding energy conservation in collisions.

beatenbob
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone I am a newbie here. I have a question regarding the change in height when two ball collides. I have draw a picture and uploaded the attachment below.

Here are some Additional information:
Ball A rolls down a frictionless slope and collide with a stationary Ball B. Both balls move together up again the frictionless slope and achieved a height, h. Note that both balls have equal masses, what is the maximum height attained by the balls after the collision?

Well, I have tried and I get the height 0.5m as my answer. But, the answer in the book is 0.25m. Below is the solution taken from the book:
Initial PE = 2(Final PE)
mg(1) = 2(2m)gh
h = 0.25m

Whereas this is my teacher's solution:

Initial PE = 10m Joules

Velocity of Ball A just before it collides with Ball B:
10m = 1/2*m*v^2
v = 20^0.5
Then, the velocity is divided by 2 (I don't know why):cry::confused:
It becomes:
1/2(2m)(1/2*20^0.50)^2 = 2mgh
Then he get the answer h= 0.25m

Well,my solution is :
Initial PE(Ball A) = Final PE(Ball A and Ball B)
mgh = (2m)gh
h = 0.5m

**I just couldn't understand why the book wrote 2(2m), and so, my teacher, made the velocity halved during his calculation. Can somebody point me out and give me explanation why it is 2(2m) ??

Thanks much!
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
beatenbob said:
Well, I have tried and I get the height 0.5m as my answer. But, the answer in the book is 0.25m. Below is the solution taken from the book:
Initial PE = 2(Final PE)
mg(1) = 2(2m)gh
h = 0.25m
The book's answer is correct, but the solution isn't very helpful. The first step assumes that you know that energy is cut in half during the collision--but they really should prove that. (It's true though.)

Whereas this is my teacher's solution:

Initial PE = 10m Joules

Velocity of Ball A just before it collides with Ball B:
10m = 1/2*m*v^2
v = 20^0.5
Then, the velocity is divided by 2 (I don't know why):cry::confused:
Because during the collision momentum is conserved, not energy:
[tex]mv_i = (2m)v_f[/tex]
[tex]v_f = v_i/2[/tex]
It becomes:
1/2(2m)(1/2*20^0.50)^2 = 2mgh
Then he get the answer h= 0.25m
Right.

Well,my solution is :
Initial PE(Ball A) = Final PE(Ball A and Ball B)
mgh = (2m)gh
h = 0.5m
You assume conservation of energy, which doesn't apply during the collision. Momentum is conserved during the collision, but energy is lost.

From conservation of momentum we know that the speed is cut in half during the collision. Let's see what happens to the kinetic energy:
[tex]{KE}_i = 1/2 m v_i^2[/tex]
[tex]{KE}_f = 1/2 (2m) v_f^2 = 1/2 (2m) (v_i/2)^2 = 1/2 {KE}_i[/tex]

That's why the book can say that the initial PE is twice the final PE.
 
Okay thanks Doc Al...Your explanation makes sense to me..Thanks lot
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K