Conservation of Momentum and Kinetic Energy in Outer Space Collisions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rowie25
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collisions Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In outer space collisions, the total momentum of a system of objects is conserved, regardless of whether the collision is elastic or inelastic. Individual object momentum may not be conserved due to changes in direction and velocity during the collision. Kinetic energy can only be zero if the objects come to rest after the collision, which is not typical in elastic collisions. The discussion emphasizes that while momentum conservation is universal, kinetic energy is often lost in real-life collisions due to factors like heat and deformation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of momentum conservation principles
  • Knowledge of elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy concepts
  • Basic physics of motion in a vacuum
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the differences between elastic and inelastic collisions in detail
  • Explore the implications of momentum conservation in various physical systems
  • Learn about energy transformations during collisions, including heat and sound
  • Investigate real-world examples of collisions in space, such as asteroid impacts
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of momentum and energy conservation in collisions, particularly in the context of outer space environments.

Rowie25
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
The question is:
In outer space, 2 objects collide.
1. Explain if the momentum of one of the objects is conserved.
2. Is the total momentum of both objects conserved? Why?
3. Before the collision, the two masses have non-zero total kinetic energy. After the collision, explain if their total kinetic energy can or can not be zero.

Wouldn't momentum be conserved for all (of one object and for both)? It's either elastic or inelastic collisions and in both momentum is conserved? I thought the objects transfer their momentum to each other. Isnt kinetic energy zero if the objects are at rest? Please help.


Thank you so much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Momentum is conserved for the system of objects. So in this case, the momentum of both summed is conserved. In response to the second question, you need to imagine a situation where the net momentum of the two spaeships is zero before and after the collision. Hint: remember momentum depends on velocity which depends on direction.
 
So momentum is conserved for the system of objects but not for each individual object? For number two you said the momentum of both the objects is conserved, maybe because when there is an equal but opposite momentum for both objects, the net momentum equals zero? And for number 3, is the kinetic energy zero if the objects collide and stay still? Because kinetic energy is energy of motion, so if it was zero wouldn't the objects be not moving? Sorry if this is worded weird. Thanks for your help!
 
Very good. I understand and you are right, so any combination of head on momenta which equals zero would result in zero kinetic energy if they stuck together. Now that may work for chewing gum, but not billiard balls. Space ships unlikely, but one might imagine a situation where there "tractor whip force fields get inextricably intertwined... More likely an expanding debris cloud with lots of KE.
 
Okay, thanks a lot! Wow that would be a crazy thing to see! Just one more thing, can you explain again why momentum isn't conserved for each individual object? That's the only thing I'm still a little confused on. I understand that the system of objects conserves momentum, but is the individual object's momentum not conserved because of space?
 
Well imagine taking a hammer to peanut brittle. Each small piece of peanut brittle is at rest and has zero momentum. You'd be hard pressed to predict where every little bit of peanut britttle goes, amazingly though if the hammer strike was perfect, the sum of all of the small pieces momenta would still be zero. Imagine the process in reverse.
 
Ohh okay! Thanks a lot!
 
You bet. BTW it's friday night, don't you have something better to do vs hanging here?:wink:
 
No. Rowie does physics questions allllll night every night.
 
  • #10
Sally99 said:
No. Rowie does physics questions allllll night every night.

Then remind your friend that all work and no play makes for a dull boy. I am here only because I have nothing better to do, enjoy helping, and find interacting with fri nite students less challenging and stressful than sunday nite students. Science can be a brutal mistress. But without curiosity, that joy of understanding and questioning, we'd all be on the savannah.
 
  • #11
ahhahah! I have finals in a couple days!
 
  • #12
Ok so I'm a little confused here

a) Momentum is not conserved for the single object.

b) The momentum of both are conserved because their sum equals zero.

c) Since it is an elastic collision, the kinetic energy can not be zero because the space ships don't stick together?

Do we have to factor in that the objects are in space? Meaning that there is not gravity?
 
  • #13
Are the answers I made earlier today correct? I can't seem to find the logic behind them. Would anyone please be willing to elaborate?
 
  • #14
a) and b) are correct. c) is correct if the collision is elastic, but the question asks what happens in collisions in general. It does not specify elastic collisions.
 
  • #15
Oh, I see that makes sense. How come we couldn't assume that the collision was elastic?
And since it is in space where there is no gravity, does it affect the collision?
 
  • #16
Except for elementary particles, real-life collisions are never elastic. There's always some amount of heat, sound, electric sparks, or deformation, and these processes lose kinetic energy.

As for your second question, the conservation of momentum always applies, gravity or not.
 
  • #17
Ohhh ok thankyou very much! So what you're basically saying is that the kinetic energy is nonzero?
 
  • #18
Unless they have equal and opposite momentum and stick together. Otherwise something wil be moving, and hence kinetic energy is present.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K