Conservation of Momentum and Kinetic Energy in Outer Space Collisions

In summary, the conversation discusses the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy in an object collision in outer space. It is stated that the momentum of both objects is conserved for the system, but not for individual objects due to factors such as space and the possibility of elastic collisions. It is also mentioned that in real-life collisions, there is always some loss of kinetic energy.
  • #1
Rowie25
16
0
The question is:
In outer space, 2 objects collide.
1. Explain if the momentum of one of the objects is conserved.
2. Is the total momentum of both objects conserved? Why?
3. Before the collision, the two masses have non-zero total kinetic energy. After the collision, explain if their total kinetic energy can or can not be zero.

Wouldn't momentum be conserved for all (of one object and for both)? It's either elastic or inelastic collisions and in both momentum is conserved? I thought the objects transfer their momentum to each other. Isnt kinetic energy zero if the objects are at rest? Please help.


Thank you so much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Momentum is conserved for the system of objects. So in this case, the momentum of both summed is conserved. In response to the second question, you need to imagine a situation where the net momentum of the two spaeships is zero before and after the collision. Hint: remember momentum depends on velocity which depends on direction.
 
  • #3
So momentum is conserved for the system of objects but not for each individual object? For number two you said the momentum of both the objects is conserved, maybe because when there is an equal but opposite momentum for both objects, the net momentum equals zero? And for number 3, is the kinetic energy zero if the objects collide and stay still? Because kinetic energy is energy of motion, so if it was zero wouldn't the objects be not moving? Sorry if this is worded weird. Thanks for your help!
 
  • #4
Very good. I understand and you are right, so any combination of head on momenta which equals zero would result in zero kinetic energy if they stuck together. Now that may work for chewing gum, but not billiard balls. Space ships unlikely, but one might imagine a situation where there "tractor whip force fields get inextricably intertwined... More likely an expanding debris cloud with lots of KE.
 
  • #5
Okay, thanks a lot! Wow that would be a crazy thing to see! Just one more thing, can you explain again why momentum isn't conserved for each individual object? That's the only thing I'm still a little confused on. I understand that the system of objects conserves momentum, but is the individual object's momentum not conserved because of space?
 
  • #6
Well imagine taking a hammer to peanut brittle. Each small piece of peanut brittle is at rest and has zero momentum. You'd be hard pressed to predict where every little bit of peanut britttle goes, amazingly though if the hammer strike was perfect, the sum of all of the small pieces momenta would still be zero. Imagine the process in reverse.
 
  • #7
Ohh okay! Thanks a lot!
 
  • #8
You bet. BTW it's friday night, don't you have something better to do vs hanging here?:wink:
 
  • #9
No. Rowie does physics questions allllll night every night.
 
  • #10
Sally99 said:
No. Rowie does physics questions allllll night every night.

Then remind your friend that all work and no play makes for a dull boy. I am here only because I have nothing better to do, enjoy helping, and find interacting with fri nite students less challenging and stressful than sunday nite students. Science can be a brutal mistress. But without curiosity, that joy of understanding and questioning, we'd all be on the savannah.
 
  • #11
ahhahah! I have finals in a couple days!
 
  • #12
Ok so I'm a little confused here

a) Momentum is not conserved for the single object.

b) The momentum of both are conserved because their sum equals zero.

c) Since it is an elastic collision, the kinetic energy can not be zero because the space ships don't stick together?

Do we have to factor in that the objects are in space? Meaning that there is not gravity?
 
  • #13
Are the answers I made earlier today correct? I can't seem to find the logic behind them. Would anyone please be willing to elaborate?
 
  • #14
a) and b) are correct. c) is correct if the collision is elastic, but the question asks what happens in collisions in general. It does not specify elastic collisions.
 
  • #15
Oh, I see that makes sense. How come we couldn't assume that the collision was elastic?
And since it is in space where there is no gravity, does it affect the collision?
 
  • #16
Except for elementary particles, real-life collisions are never elastic. There's always some amount of heat, sound, electric sparks, or deformation, and these processes lose kinetic energy.

As for your second question, the conservation of momentum always applies, gravity or not.
 
  • #17
Ohhh ok thankyou very much! So what you're basically saying is that the kinetic energy is nonzero?
 
  • #18
Unless they have equal and opposite momentum and stick together. Otherwise something wil be moving, and hence kinetic energy is present.
 

Related to Conservation of Momentum and Kinetic Energy in Outer Space Collisions

1. What causes collisions in outer space?

Collisions in outer space are typically caused by two main factors: the vast amount of space debris orbiting the Earth, and the gravitational pull of celestial bodies such as planets and moons. Space debris can range from small fragments of old spacecraft to larger pieces of rock and ice, and their collisions can be catastrophic. Additionally, the gravitational pull of celestial bodies can cause objects to be pulled towards each other, resulting in collisions.

2. How common are collisions in outer space?

Collisions in outer space occur quite frequently, but the vastness of space means that they are not always observed or recorded. However, studies have estimated that there are tens of thousands of collisions between space debris and other objects each year.

3. What are the potential consequences of collisions in outer space?

Collisions in outer space can have serious consequences, both for spacecraft and for the environment. These collisions can damage or destroy satellites and other spacecraft, disrupting communication and navigation systems. They can also produce dangerous debris fields that can pose a threat to future space missions. In addition, collisions can also contribute to the growing problem of space debris, which can impact the sustainability of space activities.

4. How do scientists track and monitor collisions in outer space?

Scientists use a variety of methods to track and monitor collisions in outer space. This includes ground-based telescopes, radar systems, and satellite tracking technologies. These tools allow scientists to detect and track space debris and potential collisions, providing valuable data for predicting and preventing future collisions.

5. What is being done to prevent collisions in outer space?

Efforts are being made to prevent collisions in outer space, such as implementing regulations for spacecraft design and operation to reduce the creation of space debris. There are also initiatives to actively remove space debris from orbit and develop technologies for early detection and warning of potential collisions. International cooperation and collaboration are crucial in addressing this issue and ensuring the sustainability of space activities.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
47
Views
805
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
961
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
473
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
842
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
55
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
1K
Back
Top