Conservation of Momentum and Thrown Objects

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the conservation of momentum in a scenario where a girl throws cannon balls from a stationary canoe. The problem requires determining the final velocity of the canoe after the throws, considering the effects of momentum and frame of reference.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of throwing the cannon balls at a specified speed relative to the canoe and question how to account for the canoe's changing velocity after each throw. There is discussion about the correct frame of reference to use for calculating the final velocity of the canoe.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering hints and clarifications regarding the frame of reference. There is a recognition of the need to analyze the situation step-by-step, particularly after each throw, but no explicit consensus has been reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

There is an assumption that friction between the canoe and water is negligible, which may influence the calculations. Participants are also navigating the complexities of switching frames of reference during the analysis.

Jessehk
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Conservation of Momentum and Thrown Objects

As part of our physics class, we've been given lots of problems typically solved by taking into account the law of conservation of momentum. I've had little-to-no trouble solving them, but one problem in particular is driving me nuts.

Homework Statement



There is a 50 kg girl in a 50 kg stationary canoe holding 2 10 kg cannon balls. She throws a cannon ball at 5 m/s, and then throws the second at 5 m/s w.r.t the boat. What is the canoe's final velocity if the (incorrect) assumption is made that their is no friction between the canoe and the water? Answer: 0.87 m/s

Homework Equations



[tex] \vec{p} = \vec{p \prime}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so I first calculate the speed of the canoe w.r.t the ground using the law.
[tex] 0 = \vec{p_c} + \vec{p_b}[/tex]

[tex] 0 = 110 v_c + 10(5)[/tex]

[tex] v_c = -5/11 m/s \approx -0.454545454... {m/s}[/tex]

Next, my idea was that the fact the second ball is being thrown at 5 m/s w.r.t. the canoe while the canoe was moving was important. So I used the L. of C. of M. again but in the frame of reference of the canoe.

[tex] 0 = 100v_c + 5(10)[/tex]

[tex] v_c = -1/2[/tex]

So I figured I would just add the speed in the frame of reference of the boat to the speed it was traveling before. That gives me
[tex] v_c \approx -0.95454545... m/s[/tex]

Which is clearly not the right answer. Am I on the wrong track completely, or is there something simple I've missed? Any help would be appreciated. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When she throws the balls at 5 m/s with respect to the canoe, they mean with respect to the canoe after the ball is thrown. If the canoe's velocity (after the throw) is Vc (negative, of course), the ball's velocity is Vc + 5.
 
Thanks Doc Al. If I'm not mistaken, that leads me to this answer:

[tex] \vec{p} = (-5/11)(110) = \vec{p \prime} = 100v_c + 10(-5/11 + 5)[/tex]

[tex] -50 = 100v_c + 500/11[/tex]

[tex] v_c = -0.9545[/tex]

Which is the same as my previous attempt. I think that makes sense, as I've just switched frames of reference. What am I doing wrong?
 
Looks to me like you're adding 5 m/s to the speed of the canoe before the throw, not after like I suggested.

I'd do it in two steps, having both throws be 5 m/s with respect to the canoe after the the throw. (The idea of changing frames is a good one; use that for the second throw.)
 
When you say after the throw, do you mean after the first ball is thrown (before which, the canoe is stationary), or after the second ball is thrown by the girl on the moving canoe?
 
After each throw. (That's how I would do it.)

Find the speed after the first throw (with the ball being 5 m/s w.r.t. the canoe after the throw). Then repeat (after switching frames) for the second throw.
 
Doc Al! Thank you so much for that help. It was exactly what I needed: it gave strong hints, and forced me to think.

In case anyone is interested:
[tex] 0 = 110 v_c + 10(v_c + 5)[/tex]

[tex] v_c \approx -0.417 m/s[/tex]

In the frame of reference of the boat...
[tex] 0 = 100v_c + 10(v_c + 5)[/tex]

[tex] v_c = -5/12 m/s[/tex]

Get back to the ground frame...
[tex] v_c = -5/12 - 5/11 \approx -0.87 m/s[/tex]

Yay!

EDIT: it could arguably be solved more simply in the ground frame, but I find it easier to visualize in the canoe frame.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K