Conservation of momentum/energy in a two particle system

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the conservation of momentum and energy in a two-particle system involving a perfectly elastic collision between two billiard balls of different masses. The key equations utilized are momentum conservation, represented as \(m\vec{v} = m\vec{u} + M\vec{U}\), and kinetic energy conservation, expressed as \(\frac{1}{2}m\vec{v}^2 = \frac{1}{2}(m\vec{u}^2 + M\vec{U}^2)\). The maximum kinetic energy transfer \(\Delta T\) from the second ball to the first is a primary focus, alongside the requirement that the angle between the velocities post-collision is always greater than \(\frac{\pi}{2}\). The discussion emphasizes the importance of separating momentum components and using vector magnitudes for energy calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of perfectly elastic collisions
  • Familiarity with vector operations and dot products
  • Knowledge of momentum conservation principles
  • Basic concepts of kinetic energy in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of momentum conservation in elastic collisions
  • Learn about vector decomposition in two-dimensional motion
  • Explore the implications of energy conservation in elastic versus inelastic collisions
  • Investigate the geometric interpretation of angles in collision scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone studying mechanics, particularly those focusing on collision theory and energy transfer in particle systems.

ghostfolk
Messages
58
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A billiard ball of mass M is initially at rest on a horizontal frictionless table. Another ball of mass m < M and velocity ##\vec{v}## the positive x-direction hits the first ball in a perfectly elastic collision. After the collision, the balls move with (unknown) velocities ##\vec{U}## and ##\vec{u}## respectively (not necessarily in the x-direction).

b) Find the maximum amount of kinetic energy ∆T that the second ball can impart on
the first ball.
c) Show that the angle between ##\vec{u}## and ##\vec{U}## will always be greater than ##\frac{\pi}{2}##.
d) Find the maximum component of the velocity ##U_y## that the larger ball can have in the
y-direction (normal to the x-direction on the table).
I'm really focused on parts b and d.

Homework Equations


##\rho_i=\rho_f##, ##K_i=K_f##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I'm not too confident on how to solve any of them but I did write down somethings.
Since it is a perfectly elastic collision on a frictionless table, then
##\rho_i=\rho_f \Rightarrow m\vec{v}=m\vec{u}+M\vec{U}##

##K_i=K_f\Rightarrow\frac{1}{2}m\vec{v}^2=\frac{1}{2}(m\vec{u}^2+M\vec{U})^2##

So if I square both sides of the first equation ##(m\vec{v})^2=(m\vec{u}+M\vec{U})^2=(m^2\vec{u}^2+2Mm(\vec{u}\vec{U})+M^2\vec{U}^2)##.

Therefore,##\frac{1}{2}m\vec{v}^2=\frac{1}{2}(m\vec{u}^2+2M(\vec{u}\vec{U})+\frac{M^2}{m}\vec{U}^2)=\frac{1}{2}(m\vec{u}^2+M\vec{U}^2)##.

Then ##\vec{u}=(\frac{M}{2m}-\frac{M}{2})\vec{U}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ghostfolk said:
b) Find the maximum amount of kinetic energy ∆T that the second ball can impart on
the first ball.
Is there a part a) that matters?

I'm not too confident on how to solve any of them but I did write down somethings.
Since it is a perfectly elastic collision on a frictionless table, then
##\rho_i=\rho_f \Rightarrow m\vec{v}=m\vec{u}+M\vec{U}##
First, somewhat trivially, you should use p instead of \rho for momentum, to avoid any possible confusion.

##K_i=K_f\Rightarrow\frac{1}{2}m\vec{v}^2=\frac{1}{2}(m\vec{u}^2+M\vec{U})^2##
What does it mean to square a vector?

So if I square both sides of the first equation ##(m\vec{v})^2=(m\vec{u}+M\vec{U})^2=(m^2\vec{u}^2+2Mm(\vec{u}\vec{U})+M^2\vec{U}^2)##.
Again, what do you mean by multiplying vectors like this?

It would be better to work with the ##x## and ##y## components of momentum separately. For energy, you need to use the magnitudes of the velocity vectors.
 
tms said:
Is there a part a) that matters?
There isn't.

What does it mean to square a vector?
It's the dot product with itself

Again, what do you mean by multiplying vectors like this?

It would be better to work with the ##x## and ##y## components of momentum separately. For energy, you need to use the magnitudes of the velocity vectors.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
981
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K