Conservative vector field; classification of derivative

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the classification of a dynamical system defined by a conservative vector field on an n-simplex. The author questions whether the space defined by the condition \(\Delta^r = \{ \mathbf{y} \; | \mathbf{y} \in R^r, \sum_i y_i = n \; \}\) qualifies as a proper manifold, given that the tangent must adhere to conservation constraints and the neighborhood of points is not entirely Euclidean. Additionally, there is uncertainty regarding the accuracy of a Taylor expansion truncated at the m-th term in this context. The forum members are invited to provide insights on these fundamental questions. The discussion seeks clarity on the mathematical properties of the system being analyzed.
Prz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Dear forum-members,

Pestered by many (in my opinion, fundamental) questions and no literature at hand to answer them, I resort to posing my questions here. Let me start with the following. (Hopefully I have the correct subsection.)

I am inspecting a dynamical, autonomous and conservative system driven by a 'conservative' vector-field:
\left\|\dot{\mathbf{x}}\right\|_1 = 0
(No need to specify this any further).
If we start off with
\left\|\mathbf{x}\right\|_1 = n
Then the system we inspect is a vector-field on an n-simplex.

To be honest I am in doubt about this being a proper manifold, since the tangent has to abide the conservation constraints, while the neighborhood of any point in the state space is not perfectly Euclidean.
In line with this: how accurate is a Taylor-expansion of a subspace cut off at the m-th term?

Any response would be very much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me address one topic at a time, and let me put the first issue differently.

Is a space
\Delta^r = \{ \mathbf{y} \; | \mathbf{y} \in R^r, \sum_i y_i = n \; \}
a proper manifold?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
835