Consider the configuration consisting a +q charge....

In summary: The numerator of what you wrote suggests ##\vec{r} = (0,y)## while the denominator suggests ##\vec{r}...In summary, the force on the middle charge is going to be zero due to symmetry.
  • #1
Decadohedron
18
0
Member advised to use the homework template for posts in the homework sections of PF.
and two -q charges aligned along the x-axis as follows...

-q__________q__________-q <--- the space between them being d

a) Suppose the +q charge is displaced perpendicularly by a small vertical distance dy. What is the total force F acting on it? Taylor expand your answer to leading order in dy
b) Next suppose instead the +q charge is displaced along the x-axis by a small dx distance. What is the force acting on it?

--------------

So for a) I'm kind of stuck at the Taylor expansion on the force.

F = (q)(-q)/4piε0d2 yhat + (q)(-q)/4piε0d2

where d= sqrt(x^2+dy^2)

I'm at a point where I'm trying to simplify something but feel that I"m doing something wrong in the math

Same for b)

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Decadohedron said:
and two -q charges aligned along the x-axis as follows...

-q__________q__________-q <--- the space between them being d

a) Suppose the +q charge is displaced perpendicularly by a small vertical distance dy. What is the total force F acting on it? Taylor expand your answer to leading order in dy
b) Next suppose instead the +q charge is displaced along the x-axis by a small dx distance. What is the force acting on it?

--------------

So for a) I'm kind of stuck at the Taylor expansion on the force.

F = (q)(-q)/4piε0d2 yhat + (q)(-q)/4piε0d2

where d= sqrt(x^2+dy^2)
One obvious problem here is you're trying to add a vector to a scalar. A less obvious one is you're using the variable ##d## in two different ways. You essentially have the magnitude of the force between the pairs of charges right:
$$F = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \frac{q^2}{x^2+y^2}$$ What should ##x## equal here?

What are the x-component and y-component of the net force on the middle charge going to be?

Once you have those expressions, then use the Taylor expansion about ##y=0##.

I'm at a point where I'm trying to simplify something but feel that I"m doing something wrong in the math

Same for b)

Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes Decadohedron and mfb
  • #3
vela said:
One obvious problem here is you're trying to add a vector to a scalar. A less obvious one is you're using the variable ##d## in two different ways. You essentially have the magnitude of the force between the pairs of charges right:
$$F = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \frac{q^2}{x^2+y^2}$$ What should ##x## equal here?

What are the x-component and y-component of the net force on the middle charge going to be?

Once you have those expressions, then use the Taylor expansion about ##y=0##.
The second expression should also have a yhat - I was posting in a bit of a hurry my bad.

Net force in the x direction is going to be 0 due to symmetry. The restoring force would be pointing back down to the origin.
I guess I'm stuck at getting that expression.

I should have
F = -2(q^2/4piε0(1/dy^2)yhat)EDIT: Pardon the bad formatting and all - trying to get used to how the forum works. Also, pardon the mad noob question - I guess I understand the logic of where the problem is going I just can't put it into math.

Thanks again.
 
  • #4
You were closer before. When the middle charge is collinear with the others, there should be no vertical force. Is your latest expression for the force consistent with that?
 
  • Like
Likes Decadohedron
  • #5
I"m supposed to calculate the force once it's shifted in delta y.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B76TBRMyBuffbkVPY3hjZU0xV3M

The picture above is where I always get to before not knowing what to do anymore.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
From your image it doesn't look to me like you've added the vectors of the forces properly.
upload_2016-9-17_8-29-36.png

By symmetry only the y-components of the forces survive the vector summation, but you haven't shown how those y-components are determined from the force magnitudes. Your work seems to be taking the full force magnitudes and just calling them y-components. Unless there's something special about your ##\hat{y}## vectors?

What do you need to multiply the force magnitudes by in order to "extract" the magnitude of their y-components?
 
  • Like
Likes Decadohedron
  • #7
gneill said:
From your image it doesn't look to me like you've added the vectors of the forces properly.
View attachment 106122
By symmetry only the y-components of the forces survive the vector summation, but you haven't shown how those y-components are determined from the force magnitudes. Your work seems to be taking the full force magnitudes and just calling them y-components. Unless there's something special about your ##\hat{y}## vectors?

What do you need to multiply the force magnitudes by in order to "extract" the magnitude of their y-components?

I should have called it something else but

##\hat{r}## = rvector/|r| = (0, y)/sqrt(x^2+y^2)
 
  • #8
Decadohedron said:
##\hat{r}## = rvector/|r| = (0, y)/sqrt(x^2+y^2)
The numerator of what you wrote suggests ##\vec{r} = (0,y)## while the denominator suggests ##\vec{r} = (x,y)##.

The vector ##\hat r = \frac{\vec{r}}{\|\vec{r}\|}## has to have a magnitude of 1. The vector ##\frac{(0,y)}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}## clearly doesn't, so the two can't be equal.

Forget about vector notation for right now. By what do you need to multiply the magnitude of the force by to get just the y-component? Note that ##x## won't appear in the final expression because ##x=0## for the middle charge.
 
  • Like
Likes Decadohedron
  • #9
vela said:
The numerator of what you wrote suggests ##\vec{r} = (0,y)## while the denominator suggests ##\vec{r} = (x,y)##.

The vector ##\hat r = \frac{\vec{r}}{\|\vec{r}\|}## has to have a magnitude of 1. The vector ##\frac{(0,y)}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}## clearly doesn't, so the two can't be equal.

Forget about vector notation for right now. By what do you need to multiply the magnitude of the force by to get just the y-component? Note that ##x## won't appear in the final expression because ##x=0## for the middle charge.

r sin theta would give me that magnitude of y?

I really appreciate the help guys - sorry that I"m being a bit dense at the moment.
 
  • #10
Decadohedron said:
r sin theta would give me that magnitude of y?
If r is the magnitude of the vector of interest and θ is the angle that r makes with the positive x-axis, then yes, r sin(θ) would give you the magnitude of its y-component.

Now, see if you can "construct" sin(θ) from the given geometry using the triangle sides.
 
  • Like
Likes Decadohedron
  • #11
I"m not quite sure what you mean by construct here, so I assumed this

rsin theta = y

sin theta = y/sqrt(d^2+y^2)
So then I taylor expanded 1/sqrt(d^2+y^2) and since it's to the highest order of y, I ended up with

sin theta approximately equals y/dWhich when I put that back into the original force equation I come out with -2q^2y/4piepsilon0d^3
 
  • #12
I don't think it matters in this case, but I'd wait to Taylor expand until after you get the expression for the force because the magnitude of the force also depends on ##y##.
 
  • Like
Likes Decadohedron
  • #13
There was no other y in the expression so I figured it'd be safe to Taylor expand then.

Glad I finally got this - thanks to you guys! My head was getting sore from beating it on the desk so much.

Now onto part b
 

1. What is the configuration being considered in this scenario?

The configuration being considered is a system consisting of a positive point charge (+q) at a specific location in space.

2. How is the electric field calculated in this configuration?

The electric field is calculated using the formula E = kq/r^2, where k is the Coulomb's constant, q is the magnitude of the point charge, and r is the distance from the point charge to the location where the field is being measured.

3. What is the direction of the electric field in this configuration?

The direction of the electric field is always away from the positive point charge, and towards the negative point charge if one exists in the system.

4. What is the significance of considering this specific configuration?

This configuration is commonly used in physics and engineering to understand the behavior of electric fields and their effects on other objects in the system. It allows for the calculation of electric potential, capacitance, and other important properties.

5. Are there any other factors that should be considered in this configuration?

Yes, in addition to the point charge, the location and orientation of other charges in the system may also affect the overall electric field and potential. The presence of conductors, dielectrics, and other materials can also impact the behavior of the system.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
150
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
665
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
31
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
200
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
730
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
806
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top