MHB Consider the following probability mass function of a random variable x

AI Thread Summary
The provided probability mass function, $p(x) = p^x (1-p)^{1-x}$ for $x=0.1$ and $0$ otherwise, is not valid as it does not sum to one. Since $x$ only takes the value of 0.1, $p(0.1)$ should equal 1, which is not achievable with the given function. Consequently, the mean of the random variable $X$ is 0.1, and the variance is 0, as there is no deviation from the mean. This indicates that the function fails to meet the criteria for a proper probability mass function.
dylbester
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
$p(x) ={p}^{x}*{(1-p)}^{1-x}$
for $x=0.1$
$0$ otherwise

Where $p$ is such that $0<=p<=1$

Question:
Find the mean and variance of $X
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dylbester said:
$p(x) ={p}^{x}*{(1-p)}^{1-x}$
for $x=0.1$
$0$ otherwise

Where $p$ is such that $0<=p<=1$

Question:
Find the mean and variance of $X$

Hi dylbester! Welcome to MHB! (Smile)

That doesn't seem to be a proper probability mass function.
The sum of $p(x)$ for all values of $x$ is supposed to be $1$.
Since there is only one value for $x$, which is $0.1$, that should mean that $p(0.1)=1$, but that is not the case for any choice for $p$.

Anyway, if there is only one value for $x$, the mean will have to be that value.
And the deviation of that mean can only be $0$, so the variance will then have to be $0$.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top