Constant acceleration proof, dv/dt=a

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of constant acceleration in physics, specifically the relationship between velocity and acceleration as expressed in the equation v = v0 + at. Participants clarify that when taking the derivative of this equation, dv/dt equals the constant acceleration a, not a function of time. The confusion arises from misapplying the product rule of differentiation, leading to incorrect interpretations of the derivative. The correct understanding is that both initial velocity v0 and acceleration a are constants in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus, specifically differentiation
  • Familiarity with the concepts of velocity and acceleration
  • Knowledge of the equations of motion under constant acceleration
  • Ability to interpret mathematical expressions and their derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the equations of motion under constant acceleration
  • Learn about the application of derivatives in physics, particularly in kinematics
  • Explore the implications of constant acceleration in real-world scenarios
  • Review the product rule and its applications in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of calculus applications in motion analysis.

Beamsbox
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
My book has stumped me on something that I thought should be simple... perhaps I'm just not getting it.

Section - Constant Acceleration

It states the following:

"When acceleration is constant, the average acceleration and instantaneous acceleration are equal and we can write...

a = aavg = (v-v0)/(t-0)

Here v0 is the velocity at time t = 0 and v is the velocity at any later time t. We can recast this equation as:

v = v0 + at (Eq. 2-11)

As a check, note that this equation reduces to v = v0 for t = 0, as it must. As a further check, take the derivative of Eq. 2-11. Doing so yields dv/dt = a, which is the definition of a."

I'm not catching the last (bold) part. The derivative of equation 2-11 being equal to a.

When I work out the derivative (in my mind) is should work like this:

dv/dt = at
=a't + at'
=1(t) + a(1)
= t + a

My mind is leaning towards the idea that the book is trying say that dv/dt = a, at t = 0. Is that what the book is trying to tell me? Because I think I'm just confusing myself.

Any proof of this would probably help me out.

Thanks, prior!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the derivative of f(t)=2 with respect to t? The derivative of f(t)=c, where c is some constant? Here, a is just another constant.
 
Yeah I'm not really sure why you think this:

dv/dt = at
=a't + at'
=1(t) + a(1)
= t + a

works.

Here's how you should see it. Equation 2-11 shows v as a function of time with initial velocity v0. In other words,

v(t) = v = v0 + at

Take the first derivative with respect to time. v0 is a constant and derivative of a constant is zero. a is also a constant and the derivative of a constant times a variable is the constant itself. So...

v'(t) = a
 
That did it, I was thinking of at as being the product of two variables... instead of say, dv/dt = 6t = 6 for example... now THAT I can understand.

Thanks for the help, it's been a few years...
 
Beamsbox said:
That did it, I was thinking of at as being the product of two variables... instead of say, dv/dt = 6t = 6 for example... now THAT I can understand.

Thanks for the help, it's been a few years...

Ah I see so you were using the product rule to get = t + a

Well, good that you understand now :)
 
Funny actually, now that I think about it, I'm in the CONSTANT ACCELERATION section... CONSTANT... doh!

Thanks again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K