Constant potential inside spherical shell

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 4K views
physicsjock
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Hey,

I just wanted to double check if what I am thinking is correct.

Say you have a spherical shell of inner radius R1, and outer radius R2, which is made of a perfect conductor carrying a charge q1.

E=0 inside (r<R1) (and also between R1<r<R2 but not worried about that)

So the potential inside the shell is constant.

Now, say there is another charge centered inside the shell,

Is it correct to think that the charge remains in its position as the potential inside the shell is constant?

So if you were to bump the charge slightly (very slightly so its barely moving) it would simply move in the direction it was pushed at a constant velocity? And this is because the potential is constant within the shell so there is no other force acting on the charge?


Thanks in advance,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physicsjock said:
Hey,

I just wanted to double check if what I am thinking is correct.

Say you have a spherical shell of inner radius R1, and outer radius R2, which is made of a perfect conductor carrying a charge q1.

E=0 inside (r<R1) (and also between R1<r<R2 but not worried about that)

So the potential inside the shell is constant.

Now, say there is another charge centered inside the shell,

Is it correct to think that the charge remains in its position as the potential inside the shell is constant?

So if you were to bump the charge slightly (very slightly so its barely moving) it would simply move in the direction it was pushed at a constant velocity? And this is because the potential is constant within the shell so there is no other force acting on the charge?
Well, there's no net electric force acting on the charge; but there's no evidence about any other forces that may or may not be acting (gravitational, inertial).
 
Yea fair enough, I didn't mention any other forces.

I was just trying to understand constant potential a little better.

Disregarding any other outside forces, is it correct to say since the potential is constant (no force acting), if the charge inside the spherical shell were pushed it would simply move in the direction it was pushed at a constant velocity (assuming it was only pushed a very small amount)?
 
physicsjock said:
Yea fair enough, I didn't mention any other forces.

I was just trying to understand constant potential a little better.

Disregarding any other outside forces, is it correct to say since the potential is constant (no force acting), if the charge inside the spherical shell were pushed it would simply move in the direction it was pushed at a constant velocity (assuming it was only pushed a very small amount)?
Yes, it is true for "mundane" scenarios (non relativistic velocities).

I'll just point out that a constant potential means a zero electric field, since the field is the gradient of the potential. No field means no force.