Constants in scalar and vector potentials

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the interpretation of constants a and γ in the scalar potential Φ and vector potential A. The constant a represents amplitude, while γ serves as the attenuation or damping factor over time, indicating that the amplitude decreases significantly by t = 5/γ. Both constants are deemed measurable, particularly through the scalar potential, and can be inferred from measurements of electric and magnetic fields. Additionally, the discussion notes that gauge conditions, such as Coulomb and Lorentz gauges, are necessary for measuring both potentials. Overall, a and γ have physical significance rather than being arbitrary values.
struggling_student
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
We have a scalar potential $$\Phi(\vec{r})=\frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \left( \frac{1}{r} - \frac{a^2\gamma e^{-\gamma t}\cos\theta}{r^3}\right)$$

and a vector potential $$\vec{A}(\vec{r})=\frac{a^2qe^{-\gamma t}}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^4}\left(3\cos\theta\hat{r} + \sin\theta\hat{\theta} \right) .$$

how do I interpret the constants ##a## and ##\gamma##. Do they have any physical meaning or are they arbitrary, unmeasurable values?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Focusing first on the formula for vector potential, we can say that ##a## is part of the amplitude while ##\gamma## is the attenuation factor (or the damping factor) with respect to time. In time ##t=\frac{5}{\gamma}## the amplitude loses 99.32% of its initial value at time t=0.

Similar things can be said for the ##\frac{1}{r^3}## term of the scalar potential.

As to if they are measurable things, yes they are. At least from what I know is that usually we can measure the scalar potential (not sure about the vector potential) and from that we can infer the values of a ang gamma.

P.S We can measure both scalar and vector potential but we have to use additional conditions (known as gauge conditions, e.g. Coulomb gauge, Lorentz gauge. In any case what we actually can measure is electric and magnetic field , ##\vec{E},\vec{B}##.
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Back
Top