Constants in scalar and vector potentials

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the interpretation of constants a and γ in the scalar potential Φ and vector potential A. The constant a represents amplitude, while γ serves as the attenuation or damping factor over time, indicating that the amplitude decreases significantly by t = 5/γ. Both constants are deemed measurable, particularly through the scalar potential, and can be inferred from measurements of electric and magnetic fields. Additionally, the discussion notes that gauge conditions, such as Coulomb and Lorentz gauges, are necessary for measuring both potentials. Overall, a and γ have physical significance rather than being arbitrary values.
struggling_student
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
We have a scalar potential $$\Phi(\vec{r})=\frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \left( \frac{1}{r} - \frac{a^2\gamma e^{-\gamma t}\cos\theta}{r^3}\right)$$

and a vector potential $$\vec{A}(\vec{r})=\frac{a^2qe^{-\gamma t}}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^4}\left(3\cos\theta\hat{r} + \sin\theta\hat{\theta} \right) .$$

how do I interpret the constants ##a## and ##\gamma##. Do they have any physical meaning or are they arbitrary, unmeasurable values?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Focusing first on the formula for vector potential, we can say that ##a## is part of the amplitude while ##\gamma## is the attenuation factor (or the damping factor) with respect to time. In time ##t=\frac{5}{\gamma}## the amplitude loses 99.32% of its initial value at time t=0.

Similar things can be said for the ##\frac{1}{r^3}## term of the scalar potential.

As to if they are measurable things, yes they are. At least from what I know is that usually we can measure the scalar potential (not sure about the vector potential) and from that we can infer the values of a ang gamma.

P.S We can measure both scalar and vector potential but we have to use additional conditions (known as gauge conditions, e.g. Coulomb gauge, Lorentz gauge. In any case what we actually can measure is electric and magnetic field , ##\vec{E},\vec{B}##.
 
Last edited:
For fun I was trying to use energy considerations to determine the depth to which a solid object will sink in a fluid to reach equilibrium. The first approach that I tried was just to consider the change in potential energy of the block and the fluid as the block is lowered some unknown distance d into the fluid similar to what is shown in the answer to this post. Upon taking the limit as the vessel's cross sectional area approaches infinity I have an extra factor of 2 in the equilibrium...