Potential Flow Theory: Circulation and the Kutta-Jukowski Theorem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around conventions in potential flow theory, specifically focusing on the circulation parameter ## \Gamma ## and its interpretation in relation to the Kutta-Jukowski Theorem, which relates circulation to lift. Participants explore the implications of these conventions in the context of flow around a rotating cylinder.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a positive ## \Gamma ## indicates clockwise or counterclockwise circulation, suggesting that the interpretation may vary based on different sources.
  • Another participant asserts that the correct stream function includes a negative sign, indicating that a positive ## \Gamma ## corresponds to counterclockwise flow.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between the circulation of the fluid and the rotation of the cylinder, with one participant stating that ## \Gamma ## is directly related to the cylinder's rotation.
  • A participant presents a modified stream function that incorporates both the flow and circulation effects, raising questions about the location of stagnation points based on the sign of ## \Gamma ##.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the conditions under which stagnation points occur, with a focus on the signs of ## \Gamma ## and the flow velocity ## U ##.
  • Confusion is noted regarding older texts that may define flow direction differently, potentially leading to discrepancies in the interpretation of signs in equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the sign conventions for circulation and the implications for flow direction, indicating that multiple competing interpretations exist. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the definitive conventions and their applications.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential confusion arising from different definitions of flow direction in older literature, which may affect the interpretation of signs in equations related to circulation and lift.

Master1022
Messages
590
Reaction score
116
Hi,

I just had a quick question about conventions in potential flow theory:
Question: What is the convention for ## \Gamma ## for the streamline ## \Psi = \frac{\Gamma}{2\pi} ln(\frac{r}{a} ) ## and how can we interpret the Kutta-Jukowski Theorem ## Lift = - \rho U \Gamma ##?

Approach:
For the first part, am I correct in thinking that ## \Gamma ## indicates a clockwise circulation? This is supported by the fact that
$$ v_{\theta} = - \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial \theta} = - \frac{\Gamma}{2 \pi r} $$
where ## \theta ## is defined to be defined as anti-clockwise from the +ve x axis. I was confused as I had seen diagrams on the internet where they have suggested that ## + \Gamma ## indicates an anticlockwise circulation. Another quick question I have is: is gamma the circulation of the fluid or the cylinder? If it's the former, does that mean that if the cylinder is rotating (e.g. CW) we take the circulation as being of equal 'strength' in the CCW direction?

For the second part, I have done the integration to get the result that ## Lift = - \rho U \Gamma ## where Lift has been defined in the +ve y-direction. However, I don't think I really understand what this means. So this formula predicts that there will be a positive lift in the y-direction when there is an anticlockwise circulation?

Any help would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The stream function for circulatory flow is actually:
$$
\Psi = -\frac{\Gamma}{2 \pi} \ln \left( \frac{r}{a}\right)
$$
So with a minus sign. This means that ##v_\theta = \frac{\Gamma}{2\pi r}## and thus a positive ##\Gamma## means counter clockwise flow.

The stream function is valid for a flow around a cylinder of radius ##a##. On this cylinder the flow direction and velocity is equal to the velocity of the edge of the cylinder. Therefore a positive ##\Gamma## denotes a flow around a cylinder spinning also in counter clockwise direction. Note that ##\Gamma = 2\omega (\pi r^2)## where ##\omega## is the rotational velocity of the cylinder. So ##\Gamma## and the rotation of the cylinder are directly related, not inversely as you suggest.

For your last question, a CW rotating cylinder with flow from left to right generates an upward force on the cylinder.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Master1022
Arjan82 said:
The stream function for circulatory flow is actually:
$$
\Psi = -\frac{\Gamma}{2 \pi} \ln \left( \frac{r}{a}\right)
$$
So with a minus sign. This means that ##v_\theta = \frac{\Gamma}{2\pi r}## and thus a positive ##\Gamma## means counter clockwise flow.

The stream function is valid for a flow around a cylinder of radius ##a##. On this cylinder the flow direction and velocity is equal to the velocity of the edge of the cylinder. Therefore a positive ##\Gamma## denotes a flow around a cylinder spinning also in counter clockwise direction. Note that ##\Gamma = 2\omega (\pi r^2)## where ##\omega## is the rotational velocity of the cylinder. So ##\Gamma## and the rotation of the cylinder are directly related, not inversely as you suggest.

For your last question, a CW rotating cylinder with flow from left to right generates an upward force on the cylinder.

Many thanks for the clarification @Arjan82 !

If we superimposed this circulation on a flow around a cylinder (with radius ## a ##) from left to right to get:
$$ \Psi = Ursin(\theta)\left( 1 - \frac{a^2}{r^2} \right) - \frac{\Gamma}{2\pi} ln \left( \frac{r}{a} \right) $$
Intuitively, I would expect ## - \Gamma ## (pointing in the -ve CCW = CW direction) to push the stagnation points to the lower half of the cylinder. However, going through the mathematics, I end up with the condition for ## v_{\theta} = 0 ## occurs at:
$$ sin(\theta) = \frac{\Gamma}{4 \pi a U} $$
Is this technically a -ve value as ## \Gamma ## is defined in the opposite direction to ## \theta ##? If that isn't the case, the a positive angle would suggest the stagnation points have been moved to the upper half of the cylinder (which doesn't agree with the diagram I have seen)

Thanks.
 
We need to be careful with definitions here. The stream function for a rotating cylinder in a horizontal flow is:
$$
\Psi = U\left(r-\frac{a^2}{r}\right)\sin(\theta) - \frac{\Gamma}{2\pi}\ln\left(\frac{r}{a}\right)
$$
as indeed you state, with U from left to right positive. This means that
$$
v_\theta = -\frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial r} = -U \sin(\theta)\left(1+\frac{a^2}{r^2}\right) + \frac{\Gamma}{2\pi r}
$$
And on a cylinder ##r = a##, thus
$$
v_\theta = -2U \sin(\theta) + \frac{\Gamma}{2\pi a}
$$
At a stagnation point ##v_\theta = 0## such that
$$
sin(\theta) = \frac{\Gamma}{4 \pi a U}
$$
So, you have it correct. For the case when the flow is from left to right and the cylinder is rotating in clockwise direction, you have ##\Gamma## negative and ##U## positive. This means ##\sin(\theta)## must be negative as well, meaning the stagnation points are in the lower half as you would expect.

Note that in this case ##U## is defined positive for flow from left to right (in the positive x direction). Older text apparently have the habit to define ##U## (or sometimes called ##V##) positive from right to left (so in the minus-x direction). Then the minus signs pop up in different places. This is where the confusion might come from.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Master1022

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K