Constants of motion symmetric spacetimes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the constants of motion in symmetric spacetimes, particularly focusing on Schwarzschild spacetime and its associated Killing vector fields (KVFs). The presence of a timelike KVF leads to conserved quantities, such as energy at infinity, which is defined as the contraction of a test particle's four-momentum with the timelike KVF. This energy is invariant and represents the energy measured by an observer at rest with respect to the gravitational source. Additionally, the discussion highlights the relationship between geodesic motion and angular momentum through the scalar products of four-velocities and spacelike KVFs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Killing vector fields (KVFs) in general relativity
  • Familiarity with Schwarzschild spacetime and its properties
  • Knowledge of Noether's Theorem and its implications in physics
  • Basic grasp of four-momentum and four-velocity in the context of relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Noether's Theorem in various physical systems
  • Explore the role of Killing vector fields in different spacetimes
  • Learn about the conservation laws associated with geodesic motion in general relativity
  • Investigate the relationship between angular momentum and spacelike KVFs in spherical symmetry
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and students in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on general relativity, cosmology, and the mathematical foundations of spacetime symmetries.

cianfa72
Messages
2,942
Reaction score
308
TL;DR
About the constants of motion associated with spacetime symmetries (KVF)
As discussed in this thread, for a symmetric spacetime (i.e. with a KVF) there are conserved quantities as constants of motion.

For instance in Schwarzschild spacetime there is a timelike KVF, hence for example the contraction of a geodesic tangent vector (4-velocity) and the timelike KVF doesn't change along a geodesic.

As said in that post the existence of conserved quantities is related to Noether's Theorem.

For Schwarzschild spacetime what does mean that Energy at infinity is conserved as constant of motion associated to the timelike KVF ?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let a freefalling test particle have four-momentum ##p^a## and the timelike Killing field be ##\xi^a##. ##p^a\xi_a## is a constant of freefall motion. Since in the limit as ##r\rightarrow\infty## we get flat spacetime with ##\xi^a## as the four velocity of an observer at rest with respect to the source of gravity, this constant is the energy measured by such an observer (or minus that, depending on metric signature convention) - hence it's called "the energy at infinity".

You can replace ##p^a## with four-velocity ##u^a## and you get energy per unit mass instead, but it can still be called the energy at infinity, so watch your units.

In the case ##|u_a\xi^a|<1## the test particle does not reach infinity, but the name is still used.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cianfa72
Ibix said:
Let a freefalling test particle have four-momentum ##p^a## and the timelike Killing field be ##\xi^a##. ##p^a\xi_a## is a constant of freefall motion. Since in the limit as ##r\rightarrow\infty## we get flat spacetime with ##\xi^a## as the four velocity of an observer at rest with respect to the source of gravity, this constant is the energy measured by such an observer (or minus that, depending on metric signature convention) - hence it's called "the energy at infinity".
Is your statement "observer at rest w.r.t. the source of gravity" an invariant one (i.e. coordinate independent) or isn't ?

Ibix said:
You can replace ##p^a## with four-velocity ##u^a## and you get energy per unit mass instead, but it can still be called the energy at infinity, so watch your units.
MTW defines the four-momentum ##p## as a covector (1-form). Are the two formulation actually equivalent?
 
Last edited:
cianfa72 said:
Is your statement "observer at rest w.r.t. the source of gravity" an invariant one (i.e. coordinate independent) or is not ?
The observer is following the integral curves of the timelike Killing field. That is invariant. Such an observer at infinity is called "at rest at infinity". Whether you want to take the name literally or not is up to you.
cianfa72 said:
MTW defines the four-momentum as a covector (1-form). Are the two formulation actually equivalent?
In any vector space equipped with a metric there's a unique invertible mapping between vectors and covectors via the metric. You must know that, surely.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cianfa72
Ibix said:
The observer is following the integral curves of the timelike Killing field. That is invariant. Such an observer at infinity is called "at rest at infinity". Whether you want to take the name literally or not is up to you.
Ah ok, got it.

Ibix said:
In any vector space equipped with a metric there's a unique invertible mapping between vectors and covectors via the metric. You must know that, surely.
Ok, we're assuming spacetime with a given (Lorentz) metric (that can be used to lower or raise tensor indices).
 
Last edited:
Since Schwarzschild spacetime is spherically symmetric there are also 3 spacelike KVFs representing the symmetries of 2-sphere.

What about the constants of motion given by the (constant) scalar products of geodesics's 4-velocity and those 3 spacelike KVFs along them ?
 
cianfa72 said:
For Schwarzschild spacetime what does mean that Energy at infinity is conserved as constant of motion associated to the timelike KVF ?
It means exactly what you said in your OP. I don't understand the question.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
cianfa72 said:
What about the constants of motion given by the (constant) scalar products of geodesics's 4-velocity and those 3 spacelike KVFs along them ?
Angular momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
cianfa72 said:
Since Schwarzschild spacetime is spherically symmetric there are also 3 spacelike KVFs representing the symmetries of 2-sphere.

What about the constants of motion given by the (constant) scalar products of geodesics's 4-velocity and those 3 spacelike KVFs along them ?
They represent angular momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
  • #10
cianfa72 said:
Ok, we're assuming spacetime with a given (Lorentz) metric (that can be used to lower or raise tensor indices).
In relativity, always.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeterDonis and cianfa72

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K