- #1
kungfuscious
- 15
- 0
Hi there! I'm working on analyzing some data from an experiment, and you can see a graph of some of the results in the attached .jpg image. I've done both a linear and a quadratic fit on the data points, weighted to error bars (the red lines are the fits). I use percents in the graph, but I'd rather use more general values between 0 and 1.
I'm trying to write out constraints on the parameters of a quadratic fit in more general terms.
Constraints:
1) I know that the quadratic fit needs to pass through the point x=1, y=0.
2) For the domain, 0[itex]\leq[/itex]x[itex]\leq[/itex]1
3) The range is similar: 0[itex]\leq[/itex]y[itex]\leq[/itex]1
4) The quadratic must fit below the line going from the top left to the bottom right. (the line y=-x+1)
Different quadratics could be drawn in here, and I'm trying to generalize. y=ax[itex]^{2}[/itex]+bx+c
What I've figured out so far is that for 1), 0=a+b+c
Then, for 4), I can say that 0[itex]\leq[/itex]y[itex]\leq[/itex]1 , and
y[itex]\leq[/itex]-x+1
I guess that also means I can say that ax[itex]^{2}[/itex]+bx+c[itex]\leq[/itex]-x+1
I can plug in for a or b or c in that equation (using 0=a+b+c), but I just end up running around in a circle.
I get the feeling there's a lot more I can do with this to write out how a and b and c might be related or constrained, but I'm a bit stuck. Can anyone help?
Cheers,
Kungfuscious
I'm trying to write out constraints on the parameters of a quadratic fit in more general terms.
Constraints:
1) I know that the quadratic fit needs to pass through the point x=1, y=0.
2) For the domain, 0[itex]\leq[/itex]x[itex]\leq[/itex]1
3) The range is similar: 0[itex]\leq[/itex]y[itex]\leq[/itex]1
4) The quadratic must fit below the line going from the top left to the bottom right. (the line y=-x+1)
Different quadratics could be drawn in here, and I'm trying to generalize. y=ax[itex]^{2}[/itex]+bx+c
What I've figured out so far is that for 1), 0=a+b+c
Then, for 4), I can say that 0[itex]\leq[/itex]y[itex]\leq[/itex]1 , and
y[itex]\leq[/itex]-x+1
I guess that also means I can say that ax[itex]^{2}[/itex]+bx+c[itex]\leq[/itex]-x+1
I can plug in for a or b or c in that equation (using 0=a+b+c), but I just end up running around in a circle.
I get the feeling there's a lot more I can do with this to write out how a and b and c might be related or constrained, but I'm a bit stuck. Can anyone help?
Cheers,
Kungfuscious