Constraint Forces and Conservation of energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between constraint forces and energy conservation in classical mechanics, specifically regarding a particle constrained to move on a surface defined by the equation f(x, t) = 0. It is established that the normal force N is assumed to be perpendicular to the surface for energy conservation to hold true when external force F is derivable from a time-independent potential. The conversation also clarifies the distinction between normal force N and ground reaction force R, emphasizing that energy conservation is valid only when R equals N, indicating that the work done by friction is zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics principles, particularly constraint forces.
  • Familiarity with Lagrange multipliers and their application in mechanics.
  • Knowledge of energy conservation laws in physics.
  • Basic concepts of forces, including normal force and ground reaction force.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lagrangian mechanics and the role of Lagrange multipliers in constraint problems.
  • Explore the implications of non-conservative forces on energy conservation.
  • Investigate the mathematical formulation of constraint forces in different mechanical systems.
  • Learn about the conditions under which energy conservation can be violated in dynamic systems.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and researchers interested in classical mechanics and the principles of energy conservation in constrained systems.

tut_einstein
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Suppose you are trying the solve the equation of motion of say a particle constrained to move on a surface f(x\vec{},t)=0. The equation of motion is:

mx\ddot{} = F\vec{} + N\vec{}, where F is an known external force and N is the unknown constraint force.

Now, when you assume that N always perpendicular to the surface, all classical mechanics books motivate that assumption by saying that it's for calculational convenience because N can in principle have any component parallel to the surface without violating the constraint. So, we just get rid of that degree of freedom by saying N = \lambda(t) *grad(f), where lambda is an arbitrary lagrange multiplier. this also let's us solve for four unknowns using four equations.
However, we also know that the assumption that N is always perpenidcular to the surface has a physical interpretation that energy is always conserved if F is derivable from a time independent potential and the surface doesn't have any explicit time dependence.

My question is whether it is possible to have energy conservation without assuming N is always perpendicular to the surface. Or did the assumption just happened to correspond to what actually happens?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tut_einstein said:
My question is whether it is possible to have energy conservation without assuming N is always perpendicular to the surface. Or did the assumption just happened to correspond to what actually happens?

I'm not so sure what you mean exactly because apparently N is the normal force but then you are adding it in x-direction(if by x you mean horizontal line) . I also think you must differentiate between what you mean by normal force N and ground reaction force R. Ground reaction force R is the sum of normal force N and friction f which is tangent to the moving surface. Therefore, N and f are just components of R in y and x directions (or n and t directions etc).

The conservation energy is valid only if the sum of the works done by non-conservative forces like friction is zero. That means if R≠N conservation of energy is not working. For it to work we must have R=N. That is, work done by friction is zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K