Prove |a|=|b| $\Rightarrow$ a=b or a=-b

  • Thread starter Thread starter ver_mathstats
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that if |a| = |b| for real numbers a and b, then a must equal b or a must equal -b. Participants debate whether to approach the proof by breaking it into cases based on the signs of a and b, with some suggesting that a direct solution is preferable. A hint is provided that |x| = |-x| = √(x²), which may help in the proof. There is also a consensus that proving the properties of absolute values is essential for the argument. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity and directness in mathematical proofs.
ver_mathstats
Messages
258
Reaction score
21

Homework Statement


Let a, b ∈ ℝ. Prove that:

If |a| = |b|, then a = b or a = -b.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I am having difficulties with beginning this proof.

Would it make sense to have: Case 1: b≥0 and Case 2: b≤0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need to break this into cases. A direct solution is best here.

Here's a hint to help you get started: |x| = |-x| = √(x2)
 
ver_mathstats said:

Homework Statement


Let a, b ∈ ℝ. Prove that:

If |a| = |b|, then a = b or a = -b.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I am having difficulties with beginning this proof.

Would it make sense to have: Case 1: b≥0 and Case 2: b≤0?

Indeed, it is a very good idea to split in cases (better 4 instead of 2 though), depending on the sign of ##a## and ##b##.

(1) ##a \geq 0, b \geq 0##
(2) ...
(3) ...
(4) ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jack476 said:
You don't need to break this into cases. A direct solution is best here.

Here's a hint to help you get started: |x| = |-x| = √(x2)

"No need to break this into cases". Maybe, if you have already proven that ##|x| = |-x|## and ##|x| = \sqrt{x^2}##. Proving this will ultimately rely on breaking up in cases... I think introducing unnecessary square roots obscures things, but that's just my opinion.
 
Math_QED said:
"No need to break this into cases". Maybe, if you have already proven that ##|x| = |-x|## and ##|x| = \sqrt{x^2}##. Proving this will ultimately rely on breaking up in cases... I think introducing unnecessary square roots obscures things, but that's just my opinion.

Yes, if you're not already given that ##|x| = |-x|##. Actually, I kind of thought that that was true by definition.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K