Constructing Explicit Deformation Retractions

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of constructing deformation retractions, specifically for the space \mathbb{R}^n-\{0\} to S^{n-1}. A mapping F(x,t) is proposed, defined as F(x,t) = (\frac{x_1}{t||x||+(1-t)},...,\frac{x_n}{t||x||+(1-t)}), which is intended to demonstrate the deformation retraction concept. The user expresses confusion regarding the intuition behind the mapping, particularly the role of the term +(1-t). Clarification is provided that the mapping satisfies F(x,0)=x and F(x,1)=x/|x|, illustrating the transition from the original space to the sphere. Ultimately, the user acknowledges receiving an answer elsewhere but reflects on the difficulty of conceptualizing such mappings.
Anonymous217
Messages
355
Reaction score
2
I don't really know why, but I'm having trouble actually building deformation retractions, although I understand the concepts behind homotopies, etc.For example, when constructing a deformation retraction for \mathbb{R}^n-\{0\} to S^{n-1}, I found that you could define the mapping F(x,t) = (\frac{x_1}{t||x||+(1-t)},...,\frac{x_n}{t||x||+(1-t)}). However, I still don't see how you can think of such a thing..
I get the idea of turning the x_ns into unit vectors, but I don't understand the intuition behind the +(1-t), etc.
Anyone want to give some advice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure what you would like to know. Your mapping F(x,t) is such that F(x,0)=x, hence F(.,0)=id on R^n - {0} and F(x,1)=x/|x| is in the (n-1)-sphere. This is the reason the t's and (t-1)'s are put there as they are.
 
^ Never mind; I got my answer somewhere else. But what I meant was how someone comes up with such an idea. It's easy to see that the mapping is a det. ret., but it's harder to actually produce the mapping to begin with (or what I was having trouble on anyways).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
346
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K