Homotopy extension property for CW pairs (Hatcher)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ForMyThunder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Extension Property
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the proof of Proposition 0.16 in Allen Hatcher's book "Algebraic Topology," specifically regarding the deformation retraction of CW pairs. Participants seek clarification on the steps involved in the proof, particularly the infinite concatenation of homotopies and how it leads to a deformation retraction of X×I onto X×{0}∪A×I.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Multiple participants express confusion about the proof of Proposition 0.16, specifically the statement regarding the deformation retraction during the t-interval [1/2^{n+1}, 1/2^n].
  • One participant requests clarification on the term A^n to better understand the proof.
  • Another participant notes that the book is available for free on Hatcher's web page, potentially aiding those without access.
  • A participant suggests that the deformation of D^{n}×I onto D^{n}×{0}∪D^{n-1}×I can be followed by the cell attaching map, indicating a process that involves deforming X^{n} onto X^{n}×{0}∪X^{n-1}×I.
  • This participant also mentions that the process can continue through the remaining n-1 cells until only X×{0} remains, and notes that while this process will stop after finitely many steps for finite-dimensional complexes, it can also apply to infinite-dimensional complexes like RP^{\infty}.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express confusion and seek clarification, indicating that there is no consensus on the understanding of the proof. Multiple viewpoints and interpretations of the deformation retraction process are presented without resolution.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in understanding the specific definitions and roles of terms like A^n, which may affect the clarity of the discussion. The proof's reliance on the properties of finite versus infinite-dimensional complexes is also noted but remains unresolved.

ForMyThunder
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
I do not understand the proof of Proposition 0.16 in Allen Hatcher's book Algebraic Topology. If someone has the book, could you please clarify the part of the proof when he says "If we perform the deformation retraction of X^n\times I onto X^n\times\{0\}\cup (X^{n-1}\cup A^n)\times I during the t-interval [1/2^{n+1},\, 1/2^n], this infinite concatenation of homotopies is a deformation retraction of X\times I onto X\times\{0\}\cup A\times I." I do not understand how this follows. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ForMyThunder said:
I do not understand the proof of Proposition 0.16 in Allen Hatcher's book Algebraic Topology. If someone has the book, could you please clarify the part of the proof when he says "If we perform the deformation retraction of X^n\times I onto X^n\times\{0\}\cup (X^{n-1}\cup A^n)\times I during the t-interval [1/2^{n+1},\, 1/2^n], this infinite concatenation of homotopies is a deformation retraction of X\times I onto X\times\{0\}\cup A\times I." I do not understand how this follows. Thanks in advance.

I don't have the book but if you tll me what A^n is I will give it a shot.
 
lavinia, the book is available for free on Hatcher's web page
 
ForMyThunder said:
I do not understand the proof of Proposition 0.16 in Allen Hatcher's book Algebraic Topology. If someone has the book, could you please clarify the part of the proof when he says "If we perform the deformation retraction of X^n\times I onto X^n\times\{0\}\cup (X^{n-1}\cup A^n)\times I during the t-interval [1/2^{n+1},\, 1/2^n], this infinite concatenation of homotopies is a deformation retraction of X\times I onto X\times\{0\}\cup A\times I." I do not understand how this follows. Thanks in advance.

I think the Idea is that the deformation of D^{n} x I

onto D^{n}x0 U D^{n-1} X I can be followed by the cell attaching map. Over all of the n-cells this deforms X^{n} onto X^{n} X 0 U X^{n-1} X I.

One then does the same thing on the remaining n-1 cells in X^{n-1} X I and so on until you are only left with X x 0. If the complex if finite dimensional this process will stop after finitely many steps but will also work for infinite dimensional complexes such as RP^{\infty}
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K