Consumer data is used in elections

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter edward
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the use of consumer data in political campaigns, particularly focusing on the techniques employed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's re-election team. It explores the implications of using personal buying habits and voter records to identify potential supporters, as well as the broader context of data collection in political strategies.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the Schwarzenegger campaign utilized a large database of consumer data, similar to strategies used in President Bush's 2004 campaign, to identify likely supporters based on personal preferences and voting histories.
  • Others express concern about the extent of data collection, suggesting that it creates an invasive environment akin to telemarketing, where voters are frequently contacted by campaigns and pollsters.
  • A participant describes the situation as "orwellian," highlighting the implications of stockpiling personal information for targeted political messaging.
  • Further reading is suggested, indicating interest in exploring the topic of consumer data and its societal impacts more deeply.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of concern and intrigue regarding the use of consumer data in elections. While there is acknowledgment of the techniques being employed, there is no consensus on the ethical implications or the effectiveness of such strategies.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying perspectives on the ethical considerations of using consumer data in political campaigns, but does not resolve the complexities surrounding privacy, consent, and the impact on voter engagement.

edward
Messages
73
Reaction score
165
We all know that a lot of consumer data is collected. I personally did not realize that it had gotten this entrenched into the political arena. Until I read a recent article about Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's campaign.

Employing technology honed in President Bush's 2004 victory, the Republican governor's re-election team has created a massive computer storehouse of data on personal buying habits and voter records to scout up likely supporters. Campaign officials say the operation, run in cooperation with the state Republican Party, is the largest of its kind in any state, at any time.

The idea is an outgrowth of techniques that businesses have long used to court new customers. Using publicly available data, the Bush campaign in 2004 knew voters' favorite vacation spots, religious leanings, the music and magazines they liked, the cars they drove.
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/states/california/northern_california/15847858.htm
or
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1110AP_Schwarzenegger_Targeting.html

Few people might realize how much information is publicly available, for a price, about their lifestyles. Companies collect and sell consumer information they buy from credit card companies, airlines and retailers of every stripe.

This is a bit of a twisted version of a politician being in touch with his or her constituents.:rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
suggested further reading: The Soft Cage by Parenti
 
I saw a program that mentioned the Republican Party has a database of every registered voter, and the Democrats are hoping to do the same. :rolleyes:

We've been getting unsolicited phone calls regularly - its almost like telemarketing. And the computerized messages are really irritating. No wonder voters get turned off.

Not only are the politicians and parties calling, but pollsters and surveyors too. Why can't they just let people alone and wait like everyone else?

Why does it seem like some people feel they have Freedom to Annoy other people?
 
I hate to use the term but it seems to fit. The whole scenario does sound very orwellian.

The Schwarzenegger campaign has stockpiled millions of names, phone numbers and addresses with consumer preferences, voting histories and other demographic information. The information allows the campaign to target a household with phone calls, mailings and visits from volunteers, with the message tailored to issues the resident is believed to care about
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
20K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1K ·
34
Replies
1K
Views
97K
  • · Replies 293 ·
10
Replies
293
Views
36K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K