What is the issue with content farming websites?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BenVitale
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Websites
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impact of Google's efforts to diminish the search engine ranking of "content farming" websites, which are characterized by the replication of content without original contributions. Participants express concern over how this initiative will affect bloggers and content creators who rely on original material. Matt Cutts, head of Google's anti-spam team, highlights the issue of webspam, particularly from Chinese domains, and emphasizes the need for Google to filter out duplicate content effectively. The consensus is that while this may harm sites with no original content, it will ultimately benefit those producing unique and valuable information.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of SEO principles and Google ranking algorithms
  • Familiarity with content creation best practices
  • Knowledge of webspam issues and their implications for search results
  • Awareness of the differences between original content and content duplication
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Google's latest algorithm updates regarding content quality and ranking
  • Learn about effective content curation techniques to avoid being labeled a content farm
  • Explore tools for checking content originality and plagiarism detection
  • Investigate strategies for improving SEO for original content creators
USEFUL FOR

Bloggers, content marketers, SEO specialists, and anyone involved in content creation and digital marketing who seeks to understand the implications of Google's content farming policies.

BenVitale
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
Computer science news on Phys.org


If Google can find a way to filter out 100 hits to 100 copies of the exact same piece of information, and just give me ONE hit on the original source, please can I have it implemented by yesterday!

If it zaps all the hits to a few million blogs that have no original content, well, that's just tough on the people who cut-and-pasted them.
 


I agree with AlephZero.

I'd also add there are a lot of websites which seem to incorporate your search result - you search for XYZ on Google and it returns a number of results. Within the top few you may note there are some exact hits that look promising. You click them and they end up taking you to a website full of adverts (again all showing what you searched for but leading to a load of unrelated rubbish) and they'll display your search phrase on the page as if showing you what you want. You click on any of these and you end up in god knows where, usually to some illegal site regarding torrents, chock full of malicious software.
 


I did some search on this topic, and found

Matt Cutts, head of Google’s anti-spam team, writes:

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/01/google-search-and-search-engine-spam.html

Last year Google faced a rash of webspam on Chinese domains in its index

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/using-data-to-fight-webspam.html

TechCrunch is referring to websites that that post any duplicate content word-for-word

http://techcrunch.com/2011/01/21/go...-were-fixing-that-and-content-farms-are-next/

What about re-posting of material, even if it is sourced? Most bloggers that writes about political/economics/social issues do that. I do that too. Will I get the label of "content farm"? By the way mainstream media does the same.
 


Well it's one thing to take quotes and comment on them in a blog, but it's another to copy the entire article over (referenced or not).

By copying the entire article all you are doing duplicating the source material. Highly unnecessary and taking up valuable Google result spots.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 99 ·
4
Replies
99
Views
7K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K