Continuity and Domain of Function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the continuity of a function defined solely for rational numbers, specifically where f(x) = 1 for rational x. The main argument presented is that continuity at x = 1 can be established by considering only rational values within the domain of f, despite the presence of irrational numbers in any open interval around x = 1. Participants conclude that the function can be considered continuous in the context of rational numbers, although it lacks certain properties of continuous functions defined over the reals, such as the intermediate value theorem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of function continuity and the epsilon-delta definition.
  • Familiarity with rational and irrational numbers.
  • Basic knowledge of the intermediate value theorem.
  • Concept of domains in mathematical functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the epsilon-delta definition of continuity in depth.
  • Explore the properties of functions defined on rational numbers versus real numbers.
  • Study the implications of discontinuity in functions like f(x) = x - π.
  • Investigate the limitations of calculus on rational numbers and the concept of completeness.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying real analysis, educators teaching calculus, and anyone interested in the nuances of function continuity within different number systems.

JG89
Messages
724
Reaction score
1
My question is best stated by using an example:

Suppose f is a function defined only for rational x, and for rational x f(x) = 1.

Say we want to prove that f is continuous at x = 1. Then we want to show that for every positive epsilon there exists a delta > 0 such that [tex]|f(x) - f(1)| < \epsilon[/tex] if [tex]|x-1| < \delta[/tex].

My question is, every open interval about x = 1 contains irrational x values where f isn't defined. If we consider only rational x, [tex]f(x) - f(1)| = 0 < \epsilon[/tex] and so it seems to be continuous. But what about the irrational values?

I'd say that my function f actually is indeed continuous, because [tex]|f(x) - f(1)| < \epsilon[/tex] must hold for all x in the interval [tex](1-\delta, 1 + \delta)[/tex], where x is IN THE DOMAIN OF F. Since only rational values are in the domain of f, we consider only those x values.

Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JG89 said:
My question is best stated by using an example:

Suppose f is a function defined only for rational x, and for rational x f(x) = 1.

Say we want to prove that f is continuous at x = 1. Then we want to show that for every positive epsilon there exists a delta > 0 such that [tex]|f(x) - f(1)| < \epsilon[/tex] if [tex]|x-1| < \delta[/tex].

My question is, every open interval about x = 1 contains irrational x values where f isn't defined. If we consider only rational x, [tex]f(x) - f(1)| = 0 < \epsilon[/tex] and so it seems to be continuous. But what about the irrational values?

I'd say that my function f actually is indeed continuous, because [tex]|f(x) - f(1)| < \epsilon[/tex] must hold for all x in the interval [tex](1-\delta, 1 + \delta)[/tex], where x is IN THE DOMAIN OF F. Since only rational values are in the domain of f, we consider only those x values.

Is this right?

I don't know in this case... where in the definition of continuity does it say you have to look at real values for x? You don't test complex values of x when determining continuity, but nothing says you shouldn't.

They may be referring to this function not as a function from the reals to the reals only defined on the rational functions (these functions are generally discontinuous, for example f(x) = x-pi fails to be 0 anywhere), but instead as a function defined on the rationals not embedded in the reals. So you lose a lot of properties of continuous functions (like the intermediate value theorem) but on the bright side you can still characterize it as continuous.

A lot of it depends on the context of the question
 
Yes, you consider only values in the domain.
We can say f is continuous, or f is rational continuous.
That said rationals are a horrible field to do calculus on as they are not complete.
This is an artifact of all the garbage books with exercises like
What is the domain of f=log(1+x)
You tell me book it is your function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K