Continuity Equation Homework: Diameter of Constriction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves fluid dynamics, specifically the continuity equation and Bernoulli's principle, applied to a horizontal pipe with varying diameters. The original poster seeks to determine the diameter of a constriction in the pipe given the flow rate and diameter of the larger sections.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the continuity equation and Bernoulli's equation to find the velocities at different sections of the pipe. Some participants suggest finding the velocity in the larger tube first before proceeding. Others question the necessity of considering the height of the fluid in the vertical tubes and whether it affects the calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various interpretations of the problem, with some providing guidance on using the continuity equation and Bernoulli's equation. There is an ongoing dialogue about the correct application of these principles and the relevance of different heights in the system.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of potential misunderstandings regarding the dimensions provided, specifically the diameter versus radius of the pipe. Additionally, the original poster expresses confusion about which sections of the pipe to include in their calculations.

Roger Wilco
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The inside diameters of the larger portions of the horizontal pipe as shown in the image (attached) are 2.50 cm. Water flows to the right at a rate of 1.80*10^4 m^3/s. What is the diameter of the constriction.
th_Photo5.jpg

Homework Equations

Continuity equation Rate of Volume flow=constant.

The Attempt at a Solution


I got a proportion worked down to
\frac{V_i}{V_o}=\frac{D_o^2}{D_i^2}

where V is velocity and the subscripts i and o denote in and out respectively.I am having trouble figuring out how to utilize the two heights of the fluids in the vertical tubes.

RW

Edit: I am now considering using Bernoulli's equation to take into account pressure. Sound better?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Using equation of continuity find the velocity of flow in larger tube. And using Bernoulli's equation find the velocity at constriction
 
rl.bhat said:
Using equation of continuity find the velocity of flow in larger tube. And using Bernoulli's equation find the velocity at constriction

There is also pressure in the larger tube (left hand side) though, so wouldn't it be Bernoulli's only? I must admit, I have been eating cookies for the last 20 minutes...let me have another go here. :)

RW
 
Before asking next question you should have found the velocity of flow in the larger tube. Now a1v1 = rate of flow of water. From this find v1.
According to Bernoulli's equation P1 + 1/2dv1^2 = P2 + 1/2dv2^2. where d is the density of water. From this find v2.
 
rl.bhat said:
Before asking next question you should have found the velocity of flow in the larger tube. Now a1v1 = rate of flow of water. From this find v1.
According to Bernoulli's equation P1 + 1/2dv1^2 = P2 + 1/2dv2^2. where d is the density of water. From this find v2.

So, do I need to even consider the flow at the left-most portion of the tube (where the 10cm vertical pipe is)?

Or can I just look at it where h= 5 cm and the rightmost portion of the tube?

I have no trouble sorting out the algebra. My trouble is with which parts of the tube I actually need to condider.

RW
 
Wow. This one is really giving me trouble if I choose to use all three sections of the tube. Maybe I can just limit it to the constricted portion and the right-most portions?
 
Last edited:
This isn't working out at all right now.

So i have so far from continuity equation:

Subscript A for rightmost portion of tube and B for the constricted portion under the 5cm vertical tube.

R_v=constant

\Rightarrow R_v=V_AA_A

\Rightarrow \pi r^2_AV_A=R_v

\Rightarrow V_A=\frac{1.8*10^{-4}}{(.025)^2\pi}=9.167*10^{-2} \frac{m}{s}

From Bernoulli:

p_B+.5\rho V_B^2+\rho gy_B=p_A+.5\rho V_A^2+\rho gy_A p=0, rho is factor of all

\Rightarrow V_B=\sqrt{V_A^2-2gy_B}=DNE The quantity I get under the radical is NEGATIVE.

Do I need to include the 10cm height? If so how?

I reall need some help on this one:confused:
 
rl.bhat said:
Before asking next question you should have found the velocity of flow in the larger tube. Now a1v1 = rate of flow of water. From this find v1.
According to Bernoulli's equation P1 + 1/2dv1^2 = P2 + 1/2dv2^2. where d is the density of water. From this find v2.

So I used this where P1= rho*g*y1 and P2=rho*g*y2 (i.e., Bernoulli's Equation)
Then instead of calculating V, I used R_v=AV

\Rightarrow V=\frac{R_v}{A}

\Rightarrow V= \frac{R_v}{\pi(.5 D)^2}
RW
 
Last edited:
You have made 2 mistakes. 1) 2.5 cm is the diameter and not the radius. 2) PA is not equal to PB. PA = rho*g*0.10 and PB = rho*g*0.05. Since tube is horizontal rho*g*yA = rho*g*yB. Now try it again.
 
  • #10
rl.bhat said:
You have made 2 mistakes. 1) 2.5 cm is the diameter and not the radius. 2) PA is not equal to PB. PA = rho*g*0.10 and PB = rho*g*0.05. Since tube is horizontal rho*g*yA = rho*g*yB. Now try it again.

I don't want to seem ungrateful, but I think you should reread my response again before assuming that I have made more errors. It is even more confusing when you say that I am incorrect when I am not.
Roger Wilco said:
So I used this where P1= rho*g*y1 and P2=rho*g*y2 (i.e., Bernoulli's Equation)
Then instead of calculating V, I used R_v=AV

\Rightarrow V=\frac{R_v}{A}

\Rightarrow V= \frac{R_v}{\pi (.5D)^2}
RW
As you can see from above quote: P1=rho*g*y1 and P2=rho*g*y2
which is exactly what you wrote.

And nowhere did I indicate that I planned on using 2.5cm as the Radius. I would be plugging in V=(R_v)/[pi*(D/2)^2]

Other than the miscommunication, I suspect that this is the correct approach.

Thanks for your help,
RW
 
Last edited:
  • #11
I posted my responce when I received this:
Do I need to include the 10cm height? If so how? Both of us were wrighting the responce simultaneously. 7.24 and 7.32. When I was camposing and sending the responce I might have received your responce, which I don't know how to see simultaneously. Any way I am sorry.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
rl.bhat said:
I posted my responce when I received this:
Any way I am sorry.


Don't be:wink: I was just trying to be sure that we were on the same page. I think I can wrap this one up now:smile: Thank you for your help rl. bhat!

RW
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K