What is the Definition of Continuity in Minkowski Space?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on defining continuity for maps in Minkowski space, specifically addressing the limitations of using the Minkowskian product metric for this purpose. Participants agree that continuity should be defined with respect to the canonical Euclidean topology of Minkowski space-time, which is identified as a 4-D real vector space characterized by a symmetric, bilinear, non-degenerate quadratic form with signature (1,3). The conversation highlights the potential for using the Euclidean norm to establish continuity, while also noting that other topologies can be applied without relying on a metric.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Minkowski space and its properties
  • Familiarity with Euclidean topology
  • Knowledge of quadratic forms and their signatures
  • Basic concepts of continuity in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the canonical Euclidean topology in Minkowski space
  • Explore the implications of pseudo-Riemannian metric tensors on vector spaces
  • Read "The Geometry of Minkowski Spacetime: An Introduction to the Mathematics of the Special Theory of Relativity" by Naber
  • Investigate Alexandrov interval topology and its applications in spacetime
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying relativity or topology, particularly those interested in the properties of Minkowski space and continuity definitions in mathematical contexts.

cosmic dust
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
How "continuity" of a map Τ:M→M, where M is a Minkowski space, can be defined? Obviously I cannot use the "metric" induced by the minkowskian product:
x\cdoty = -x^{0}y^{0}+x^{i}y^{i}
for the definition of coninuity; it is a misinformer about the proximity of points. Should I use the Euclidean metric instead?

Thank's...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Minkowski space-time is just ##\mathbb{R}^{4}## with the canonical Euclidean topology. Continuity of endomorphisms of Minkowski space-time is with respect to this topology.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I took the wikipedia's definition of Minkowski space: a 4-D real vector space with a symmetric, bilinear, non-degenerate quadratic form with signature (1,3). From this point of view, can a consistent metric induced by that quadratic form? If not, then according to your comment, I will have to make use and of the Eucliden norm on that vector space, in order to define continuity.

Right?
 
cosmic dust said:
I took the wikipedia's definition of Minkowski space: a 4-D real vector space with a symmetric, bilinear, non-degenerate quadratic form with signature (1,3). From this point of view, can a consistent metric induced by that quadratic form? If not, then according to your comment, I will have to make use and of the Eucliden norm on that vector space, in order to define continuity.
I've never seen pseudo-Riemannian metric tensors on vector spaces being used to induce a topology on the vector space but that's not to say that it isn't defined (you can define it in the same way). The canonical topology on Minkowski space-time would just be that generated by the base of open balls of the Euclidean metric yes. There are other topologies you can endow as well of course and they don't have to stem from a metric.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
The beautiful [math] book "The Geometry of Minkowski Spacetime: An Introduction to the Mathematics of the Special Theory of Relativity" by Naber has an appendix that discusses topology for Minkowski spacetime.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K