MHB Continuity of f(0): Does It Exist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chipset3600
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity Point
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the continuity of the function f(0), which is deemed not to exist due to improper definition. The original function includes problematic symbols and lacks a proper constant value for f(0). A suggested correction indicates that f(0) should equal 1, based on the limit as x approaches 0. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly defining functions at specific points to ensure continuity. Overall, clarity in mathematical notation is essential for accurate problem-solving.
Chipset3600
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Hello MHB, the f(0) of this function doesn't exist, so I am i wrong or this question don't hv solution?

View attachment 406
 

Attachments

  • forum.png
    forum.png
    8.9 KB · Views: 86
Physics news on Phys.org
Chipset3600 said:
Hello MHB, the f(0) of this function doesn't exist, so I am i wrong or this question don't hv solution?

View attachment 406

Hi Chipset3600, :)

Your function seem to have some strange symbols which I don't understand. Is it,

\[f(x)=\begin{cases}\frac{2}{\pi}\mbox{arctan}\left(\frac{x+1}{x^2}\right),&\,x=0\\

(x+1)^{1/\sec(x)}-\frac{\cos 2x}{x+1},&\,x<0\\

\frac{\sec^{2}x}{x.3^x-9x^2},&x>0\\

\end{cases}\]

In that case the definition seem to be problematic since \(f(0)\) is not defined properly. \(f(0)\) should be a constant value whereas in the definition it's not.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Well, my language is portuguese, i forgot the translate of symbols: sen^2(x) = sin^(x), arctg(x)=arctan(x)..
and in the exercise is sin^2(x) and not sec^2(x).
Sudharaka said:
Hi Chipset3600, :)

Your function seem to have some strange symbols which I don't understand. Is it,

\[f(x)=\begin{cases}\frac{2}{\pi}\mbox{arctan}\left(\frac{x+1}{x^2}\right),&\,x=0\\

(x+1)^{1/\sec(x)}-\frac{\cos 2x}{x+1},&\,x<0\\

\frac{\sec^{2}x}{x.3^x-9x^2},&x>0\\

\end{cases}\]

In that case the definition seem to be problematic since \(f(0)\) is not defined properly. \(f(0)\) should be a constant value whereas in the definition it's not.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Chipset3600 said:
Well, my language is portuguese, i forgot the translate of symbols: sen^2(x) = sin^(x), arctg(x)=arctan(x)..
and in the exercise is sin^2(x) and not sec^2(x).

Good. But the problem here is that the function is not defined at \(x=0\) properly. We know that,

\[\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\left[\frac{2}{\pi}\mbox{arctan}\left( \frac{x+1}{x^2}\right)\right]=1\]

So maybe the author would have meant ,

\[

f(x)=\begin{cases}1,&\,x=0\\

(x+1)^{1/\sin(x)}-\frac{\cos 2x}{x+1},&\,x<0\\ \frac{\sin^{2}x}{x.3^x-9x^2},&x>0\\

\end{cases}\]
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K