Chipset3600
- 79
- 0
Hello MHB, the f(0) of this function doesn't exist, so I am i wrong or this question don't hv solution?
View attachment 406
View attachment 406
The discussion centers around the continuity of the function f(0) defined as a piecewise function. Participants identified that f(0) is not properly defined in the original formulation, leading to confusion. The correct limit as x approaches 0 is established as 1, suggesting that the function should be redefined to include this value at x=0. The revised function proposed includes a constant value of 1 for f(0) and corrects the terms for x<0 and x>0.
PREREQUISITESStudents of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in understanding function continuity and limits in mathematical analysis.
Chipset3600 said:Hello MHB, the f(0) of this function doesn't exist, so I am i wrong or this question don't hv solution?
View attachment 406
Sudharaka said:Hi Chipset3600, :)
Your function seem to have some strange symbols which I don't understand. Is it,
\[f(x)=\begin{cases}\frac{2}{\pi}\mbox{arctan}\left(\frac{x+1}{x^2}\right),&\,x=0\\
(x+1)^{1/\sec(x)}-\frac{\cos 2x}{x+1},&\,x<0\\
\frac{\sec^{2}x}{x.3^x-9x^2},&x>0\\
\end{cases}\]
In that case the definition seem to be problematic since \(f(0)\) is not defined properly. \(f(0)\) should be a constant value whereas in the definition it's not.
Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
Chipset3600 said:Well, my language is portuguese, i forgot the translate of symbols: sen^2(x) = sin^(x), arctg(x)=arctan(x)..
and in the exercise is sin^2(x) and not sec^2(x).