Chipset3600
- 79
- 0
Hello MHB, the f(0) of this function doesn't exist, so I am i wrong or this question don't hv solution?
View attachment 406
View attachment 406
The discussion revolves around the continuity of a function at the point \(f(0)\). Participants explore whether \(f(0)\) is defined and whether it exists based on the given piecewise function. The scope includes conceptual understanding and mathematical reasoning.
Participants do not reach a consensus on whether \(f(0)\) exists or is properly defined. There are competing views regarding the interpretation of the function and its continuity at that point.
There are unresolved issues regarding the proper definition of the function at \(x=0\) and the implications of the limit as \(x\) approaches 0. The discussion reflects confusion over the notation and the correct interpretation of the function's components.
Chipset3600 said:Hello MHB, the f(0) of this function doesn't exist, so I am i wrong or this question don't hv solution?
View attachment 406
Sudharaka said:Hi Chipset3600, :)
Your function seem to have some strange symbols which I don't understand. Is it,
\[f(x)=\begin{cases}\frac{2}{\pi}\mbox{arctan}\left(\frac{x+1}{x^2}\right),&\,x=0\\
(x+1)^{1/\sec(x)}-\frac{\cos 2x}{x+1},&\,x<0\\
\frac{\sec^{2}x}{x.3^x-9x^2},&x>0\\
\end{cases}\]
In that case the definition seem to be problematic since \(f(0)\) is not defined properly. \(f(0)\) should be a constant value whereas in the definition it's not.
Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
Chipset3600 said:Well, my language is portuguese, i forgot the translate of symbols: sen^2(x) = sin^(x), arctg(x)=arctan(x)..
and in the exercise is sin^2(x) and not sec^2(x).