Continuity of Function - f(x)=|cos(x)|

Click For Summary
The function f(x) = |cos(x)| is discussed in terms of its continuity properties, with emphasis on its piecewise continuity. While it is continuous and uniformly continuous, the mention of piecewise continuity may be unnecessary or confusing, as any continuous function is inherently piecewise continuous. The discussion highlights that piecewise continuity typically refers to functions that have discontinuities at certain points. There is speculation that the term may be used in the context of integrating the function to avoid errors. Overall, the conversation concludes that the function's continuity status is clear, and the piecewise aspect may serve as a cautionary note in specific applications.
EEristavi
Messages
108
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


[/B]
We have a function f(x) = |cos(x)|.

It's written that it is piecewise continuous in its domain.
I see that it's not "smooth" function, but why it is not continuous function - from the definition is should be..

Homework Equations


[/B]
We say that a function f is continuous at an interior point c of its domain if
lim(x->c) f(x) = f(c).

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I solved the problem but this piecewise continuity is bothering me
 

Attachments

  • cos(x).jpg
    cos(x).jpg
    10.7 KB · Views: 554
Physics news on Phys.org
##f(x) =|\cos x|## is uniformly continuous, continuous and piecewise continuous. Why the piecewise continuity is emphasized in your context doesn't become clear from your post. Maybe it's needed as a condition in another theorem, where piecewise continuity plays a role.
 
  • Like
Likes EEristavi
EEristavi said:

Homework Statement


[/B]
We have a function f(x) = |cos(x)|.

It's written that it is piecewise continuous in its domain.
I see that it's not "smooth" function, but why it is not continuous function - from the definition is should be..

Homework Equations


[/B]
We say that a function f is continuous at an interior point c of its domain if
lim(x->c) f(x) = f(c).

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I solved the problem but this piecewise continuity is bothering me

You are right: there is a little, easily-proved theorem that if ##f## is continuous, then so is ##|f|##. (However, as you point out, it is piecewise smooth, but that is a different issue.)

Unless the book you are using has some unusual definitions, I don't think describing the function as "piecewise continuous" is helpful; it is not really wrong, just useless. Basically, by the same token, any continuous function is also piecewise continuous!

The way I have seen the terms "piecewise continuity" employed is for functions that are continuous on intervals ##(a_1, a_2), (a_2, a_3), \ldots## but with ##f(a_2 + 0) \neq f(a_2 - 0),## etc---that is, has discontinuities of the first kind.
 
  • Like
Likes EEristavi
Note that this function is continuous, as composition of 2 continuous functions, at least if the functions don't have some kind of strange domain.

I.e.: for ##x \in \mathbb{R}:|\cos(x)| = (|\cdot | \circ \cos) (x)##

For me, it is not entirely clear what the relevance of this question is. Can you specify what the domain of the functions is?
 
Thank you all for the quick replies.
I will attach the screenshot from book, just in case.

However, I think the case is closed (Thanks again)
 

Attachments

  • pwc.jpg
    pwc.jpg
    11 KB · Views: 539
EEristavi said:
Thank you all for the quick replies.
I will attach the screenshot from book, just in case.

However, I think the case is closed (Thanks again)

Since continuity => piecewise continuity, indeed the case is closed.

Maybe they mean with piecewise here that you have to split up the integral with linearity to get rid off the absolute value signs, but this is just a guess in the wild.
 
  • Like
Likes EEristavi
EEristavi said:
Thank you all for the quick replies.
I will attach the screenshot from book, just in case.

However, I think the case is closed (Thanks again)
I think in this specific case, it may be meant as a hint where to cut the integral to get the values correct - I'd take it as error avoidance.
 
  • Like
Likes EEristavi
fresh_42 said:
I think in this specific case, it is meant as a hint where to cut the integral to get the values correct - I'd take it as error avoidance.

I also though of this. I just asked here also, just to be sure and don't learn something wrong :)

Thanks for help )
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K