Continuity of the wave function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the continuity of the wave function in quantum mechanics, exploring its implications for physical significance, boundary conditions, and the Schrödinger equation. Participants examine various hypotheses regarding the necessity of continuity and its role in defining quantum states, as well as the potential for discontinuous wave functions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that the wave function and its first derivative must be continuous to ensure that the probability of finding a particle is well-defined in the neighborhood of a point.
  • Others suggest that continuity is necessary for the wave function to be physically significant, while some propose that it is a consequence of the eigenvalue equation HΨ=EΨ.
  • One participant contends that continuity is not fundamentally necessary, citing the existence of Dirac delta functions in quantum mechanics, which are not continuous.
  • Another participant emphasizes the relevance of continuity in establishing boundary conditions in problems like the potential well, noting that textbooks often state continuity without further explanation.
  • A different viewpoint posits that continuity can be inferred from the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, as discontinuities would lead to undefined behavior in the Hamiltonian operator.
  • Some participants question whether wave functions must satisfy the Schrödinger equation for all x, suggesting that discontinuous wave functions could still satisfy the equation in certain regions.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of discontinuities on the probability of finding a particle, with one participant noting that if the wave function is not continuous, the total probability may not equal 1.
  • Another participant argues that the continuity of the wave function or its derivative is not strictly necessary, as long as the necessary integrals exist for predictions in quantum mechanics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the necessity of continuity for wave functions, with no consensus reached. Some assert its importance, while others challenge the need for such constraints, leading to an unresolved discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions regarding the continuity of wave functions, including the implications of discontinuities on the Schrödinger equation and the physical interpretation of wave functions. The discussion reflects differing perspectives on the mathematical and physical frameworks of quantum mechanics.

  • #31
actually i have my exam and i am really weak in quantum mechanics ... i would like to know another question sir ... i know the physical meaning of normalization , will you please tell me the physical meaning of orthogonality ? i have one more small assignment too .. i tried but unable to do ... the question is that if H is an operator of an eigen function U1 with eigen value E1 and H is an operator of an eigen function U2 with eigen value E2 then show that H is also an operator of the eigen function U1+U2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
pi11 said:
actually i have my exam and i am really weak in quantum mechanics ... i would like to know another question sir ... i know the physical meaning of normalization , will you please tell me the physical meaning of orthogonality ? i have one more small assignment too .. i tried but unable to do ... the question is that if H is an operator of an eigen function U1 with eigen value E1 and H is an operator of an eigen function U2 with eigen value E2 then show that H is also an operator of the eigen function U1+U2.

This really belongs in the homework help section.

But I will answer the orthogonality question by asking you to apply the Born rule to orthogonal states.

Since they are eigenfunctions H*U1 = E1*U1 and H*U1 = E1*U1 so H*(U1 +U2) = H*(E1 + E2) so E1 + E2 is an eigenvalue of H with eigenfunction U1+U2.

Thanks
Bill
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K