Continuous bounded function - analysis

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that a continuous function f: R -> R, which tends to +∞ as x approaches ±∞, has a minimum value at some point x0 in R. The initial proof attempt incorrectly assumes that the minimum can be found within any arbitrary closed interval [a, b], neglecting the possibility of smaller values outside this interval. A key correction is suggested: by selecting a specific real number a and recognizing that f(x) exceeds f(a) for sufficiently large |x|, one can then apply the theorem on the bounded interval [-N, N]. This adjustment ensures that the proof rigorously accounts for the behavior of f at infinity, leading to the conclusion that f(x) is indeed greater than or equal to f(x0) for all x in R.
Kate2010
Messages
134
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Assume the theorem that a continuous bounded function on a closed interval is bounded and attains its bounds.
Prove that if f: R -> R is continuous and tends to +\infty as x tends to +/- \infty then there exists an x0 in R such that f(x) \geq f(x0) for all x in R.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I think I understand the basic idea behind this but I'm not sure that my proof is rigorous enough.

R is not closed or bounded, however as x tends to +/- infinity f(x) tends to infinity, so won't affect its minimum value (do I need to prove this? If so, how?)

So to consider the minimum value of f we can consider a closed bounded interval [a,b] a,b in R

By the assumed theorem, f is bounded on this interval and attains its bounds, so there exists an x0 in [a,b] such that f(x0) = inf f(x) in the interval [a,b]

By definition of an infimum we then know that f(x) \geq f(x0) for all x in R.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kate2010 said:

Homework Statement


Assume the theorem that a continuous bounded function on a closed interval is bounded and attains its bounds.
Prove that if f: R -> R is continuous and tends to +\infty as x tends to +/- \infty then there exists an x0 in R such that f(x) \geq f(x0) for all x in R.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I think I understand the basic idea behind this but I'm not sure that my proof is rigorous enough.

R is not closed or bounded, however as x tends to +/- infinity f(x) tends to infinity, so won't affect its minimum value (do I need to prove this? If so, how?)

So to consider the minimum value of f we can consider a closed bounded interval [a,b] a,b in R

By the assumed theorem, f is bounded on this interval and attains its bounds, so there exists an x0 in [a,b] such that f(x0) = inf f(x) in the interval [a,b]

By definition of an infimum we then know that f(x) \geq f(x0) for all x in R.
There is a fundamental problem with your proof. You have taken x0 such that f(x)\ge f(x_0) in [a, b]. But [a, b] is just "some" interval. There is no reason to think that f does not have smaller values off [a,b]. Also notice that you have NOT used the fact that f goes to infinity.

But that's easily fixed. Take "a" to be any real number. Since f goes to infinity as x goes to either infinity or negative infinity, there exist a positive number, N, such that if x> N or x< -N, f(x)> f(a). NOW use your proof on the interval [-N, N].
 
Kate2010 said:

Homework Statement


Assume the theorem that a continuous bounded function on a closed interval is bounded and attains its bounds.
Prove that if f: R -> R is continuous and tends to +\infty as x tends to +/- \infty then there exists an x0 in R such that f(x) \geq f(x0) for all x in R.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I think I understand the basic idea behind this but I'm not sure that my proof is rigorous enough.

R is not closed or bounded, however as x tends to +/- infinity f(x) tends to infinity, so won't affect its minimum value (do I need to prove this? If so, how?)
I have no idea what you even mean by that!

So to consider the minimum value of f we can consider a closed bounded interval [a,b] a,b in R

By the assumed theorem, f is bounded on this interval and attains its bounds, so there exists an x0 in [a,b] such that f(x0) = inf f(x) in the interval [a,b]

By definition of an infimum we then know that f(x) \geq f(x0) for all x in R.
There is a fundamental problem with your proof. You have taken x0 such that f(x)\ge f(x_0) in [a, b]. But [a, b] is just "some" interval. There is no reason to think that f does not have smaller values off [a,b]. Also notice that you have NOT used the fact that f goes to infinity.

But that's easily fixed. Take "a" to be any real number. Since f goes to infinity as x goes to either infinity or negative infinity, there exist a positive number, N, such that if x> N or x< -N, f(x)> f(a). NOW use your proof on the interval [-N, N].
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K