Continuous Compounding Interest

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ecoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous Interest
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison between continuous compounding interest and regular compounding interest, particularly focusing on scenarios where participants observe discrepancies in the final amounts calculated using both methods. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and conceptual clarification regarding the formulas used for interest calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the regular compounding formula yields a larger amount than the continuous compounding formula when using a large interest rate, suggesting potential calculator inaccuracy or misunderstanding.
  • Another participant asserts that continuous compounding should always result in a larger amount and requests an example to illustrate the contrary claim.
  • A participant provides calculations for both compounding methods, showing that the non-continuous compounding result is less than the continuous compounding result, but questions the correctness of their thinking regarding the calculations.
  • Clarification is offered regarding the periodic interest rate in the context of the regular compounding formula, emphasizing the need to divide the annual interest rate by the number of compounding periods.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the outcomes of the compounding methods, with some asserting that continuous compounding should yield a higher amount, while others present examples that challenge this notion. The discussion remains unresolved as participants explore different perspectives and calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached a consensus on the calculations or the implications of their findings. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the application of the formulas and the interpretation of large interest rates.

ecoo
Messages
86
Reaction score
2
Hello

So from what I understand, the continuous compound formula finds out the most you can get from interest no matter how many times you compound the interest in a set amount of time. So how come when I plugin in a big number into the regular compounding formula for the rate, the end amount is more than the amount I get when calculating with the continuous compounding formula? I think that it's a calculator inaccuracy, or is my view incorrect?

Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ecoo said:
Hello

So from what I understand, the continuous compound formula finds out the most you can get from interest no matter how many times you compound the interest in a set amount of time. So how come when I plugin in a big number into the regular compounding formula for the rate, the end amount is more than the amount I get when calculating with the continuous compounding formula? I think that it's a calculator inaccuracy, or is my view incorrect?

Thanks for the help!
Interest compounded continuously should give the larger amount. Can you show us an example where the normal compounding formula seems to give a larger interest amount?

Are you forgetting to divide the annual interest rate by the number of compounding periods per year?
 
Mark44 said:
Interest compounded continuously should give the larger amount. Can you show us an example where the normal compounding formula seems to give a larger interest amount?

Are you forgetting to divide the annual interest rate by the number of compounding periods per year?
So for example, if I use the regular compounding interest for 6% for 10 years, and the rate is 999999999999 (add more if you want), then the answer is more than the continuous equation result. Besides the answer, is my thinking correct?
 
Noncontinuous: A_{noncont}=P(1+\frac{0.06}{999999999999})^{10\times999999999999}=1.82124518238P
Continuous: A_{cont}=Pe^{(0.06\times10)}=1.82211880039P
A_{noncont}<A_{cont}
 
ecoo said:
So for example, if I use the regular compounding interest for 6% for 10 years, and the rate is 999999999999 (add more if you want), then the answer is more than the continuous equation result. Besides the answer, is my thinking correct?
The rate refers to the interest rate, which in your example is 6%. The periodic interest rate would be .06/999999999999.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K