Continuous mappings into a Hausdorff space

  • Thread starter Thread starter radou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the set S = {x in X : f(x) = g(x)} is closed in a Hausdorff space Y, given continuous functions f, g: X → Y. The proof demonstrates that the complement X\S is open by constructing disjoint open neighborhoods U and V for distinct values f(x) and g(x). The continuity of f and g ensures that the preimages f^-1(U) and g^-1(V) are open in X, confirming that X\S can be expressed as a union of open sets, thus establishing that S is closed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuous functions in topology
  • Familiarity with Hausdorff spaces
  • Knowledge of open and closed sets in metric spaces
  • Basic concepts of preimages in function mappings
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hausdorff spaces in depth
  • Learn about the implications of continuity in topological spaces
  • Explore the concept of open and closed sets in various topological contexts
  • Investigate the role of preimages in function analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying topology, and anyone interested in the properties of continuous functions within Hausdorff spaces.

radou
Homework Helper
Messages
3,149
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement



Here's another one I'd like to check.

Let f, g : X --> Y be continuous functions into a Hausdorff space Y. Show that S = {x in X : f(x) = g(x)} is closed in X.

The Attempt at a Solution



Let X\S be the complement of S in X. Let's show it's open.

Let x be an element of X\S = {x in X : f(x)\neqg(x)}. For f(x) and g(x), choose disjoint open neighborhoods U and V, respectively. Now, f^-1(U)\capf^-1(V) is an open neighborhood of x which is contained in X\S. Since X\S can be written as a union of such open sets, it is itself open. Hence, S is closed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's take it step by step (like the series... (-:).

you take x in X\S, which means we have y1=f(x), y2=g(x) which are distinct, now you use Ys haussdorfian, and you take two sets U and V which are disjoint neighbourhoods of y1 and y2 respectively, x is contained in the intersection of f^-1(U) and g^-1(V) (and not both with f^-1), now because f and g are continuous f^-1(U) and g^-1(V) are open in X.
so you showed that X\S is contained in a union of the above open sets, now show the other inculsion, well it's kind of basic as well.
 
Thanks for the reply.

I don't see why I should "use the other inclusion", since I managed to represent X\S as a union of its subsets "over all elements of X\S".

Yes, "f^-1" appeared twice - it was a mistype.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K