Continuous set of eigenvalues in matrix representation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the representation of observables in quantum mechanics, specifically how Hermitian operators with continuous spectra are expressed in matrix form. It is established that for observables like the position operator in one-dimensional space, the spectrum is continuous, leading to a representation that is not a traditional matrix but a distribution. The position representation is defined as X(x_1,x_2)=\langle x_1|\hat{x} x_2 \rangle=x_2 \delta(x_1-x_2), and the operator's action is described through a convolution integral rather than a matrix-vector product. This clarification resolves the initial query regarding continuous eigenvalue representations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with continuous spectra and their implications
  • Knowledge of convolution integrals in mathematical physics
  • Basic concepts of position representation in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the mathematical framework of distributions and their applications
  • Learn about convolution integrals and their role in operator theory
  • Investigate the implications of continuous spectra in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, mathematicians specializing in functional analysis, and students studying advanced quantum mechanics concepts will benefit from this discussion.

nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,771
Reaction score
255
Let's see if I have this straight: Observables are represented by Hermitian operators, which can be, for some appropriate base, represented in matrix form with the eigenvalues forming the diagonal. Sounds nice until I consider observables with continuous spectra. How do you get something like that into matrix form?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The representation of operators in the eigenbasis is not a matrix, if there are continuous spectra. Then you have distributions. Take the position representation of the position operator in one-dimensional space. Its spectrum is entirely continuous (entire ##\mathbb{R}##). It's position representation is
##X(x_1,x_2)=\langle x_1|\hat{x} x_2 \rangle=x_2 \delta(x_1-x_2).##
That's not a matrix but a distribution. The action of the operator on a vector in such a case is not given by a usual matrix-vector product but by a convolution integral. Of course, in position representation that's very simple
##\langle x|\hat{x} \psi \rangle=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x' X(x,x') \langle x'|\psi \rangle=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x' X(x,x') \psi(x')=x \psi(x)##
as it must be due to the direct evaluation
##\langle x|\hat{x} \psi \rangle = \langle \hat{x} x|\psi \rangle=x \langle x |\psi \rangle=x \psi(x).##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nomadreid
Thanks very much, vanhees71. That clears up my question completely. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K