Continuous set of eigenvalues in matrix representation?

  • #1

nomadreid

Gold Member
1,619
186
Let's see if I have this straight: Observables are represented by Hermitian operators, which can be, for some appropriate base, represented in matrix form with the eigenvalues forming the diagonal. Sounds nice until I consider observables with continuous spectra. How do you get something like that into matrix form?
 
  • #2
The representation of operators in the eigenbasis is not a matrix, if there are continuous spectra. Then you have distributions. Take the position representation of the position operator in one-dimensional space. Its spectrum is entirely continuous (entire ##\mathbb{R}##). It's position representation is
##X(x_1,x_2)=\langle x_1|\hat{x} x_2 \rangle=x_2 \delta(x_1-x_2).##
That's not a matrix but a distribution. The action of the operator on a vector in such a case is not given by a usual matrix-vector product but by a convolution integral. Of course, in position representation that's very simple
##\langle x|\hat{x} \psi \rangle=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x' X(x,x') \langle x'|\psi \rangle=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x' X(x,x') \psi(x')=x \psi(x)##
as it must be due to the direct evaluation
##\langle x|\hat{x} \psi \rangle = \langle \hat{x} x|\psi \rangle=x \langle x |\psi \rangle=x \psi(x).##
 
  • Like
Likes nomadreid
  • #3
Thanks very much, vanhees71. That clears up my question completely. :)
 

Suggested for: Continuous set of eigenvalues in matrix representation?

Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
746
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
631
Replies
4
Views
557
Replies
2
Views
698
Replies
1
Views
549
Back
Top