Contraction of the canonical symplectic form by vertical vectors

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the contraction of the canonical symplectic form by vertical vectors in the context of symplectic geometry. Participants explore the properties of the canonical symplectic form on the cotangent bundle \( T^*M \), particularly focusing on proving certain relationships in a coordinate-free manner.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the canonical symplectic form on \( T^*M \) is the exterior derivative of the tautological 1-form, expressed as \( \omega = d\alpha \).
  • A later post corrects this claim, asserting that the canonical symplectic form should actually be \( \omega = -d\alpha \).
  • Another participant suggests consulting the book by Anna Canna Da Silva for properties of the tautological 1-form in a coordinate-free context.
  • A participant acknowledges familiarity with Da Silva's book but expresses difficulty finding the specific proof in it, indicating a preference for the book by Libermann and Marle instead.
  • One participant expresses gratitude for the recommendation of the book by Libermann and Marle.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct formulation of the canonical symplectic form, as there is a correction proposed regarding its sign. Additionally, there is no agreement on the best reference for proving the properties in a coordinate-free manner, with differing preferences expressed.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific texts that may contain relevant proofs, but there is uncertainty regarding the availability of the desired information in those texts. The discussion reflects a reliance on various definitions and interpretations of the canonical symplectic form.

mma
Messages
270
Reaction score
5
The canonical symplectic form on T^*M is the exterior derivative of the tautological 1-form:
\omega=d\alpha​
where \alpha_p(X):=p(d\pi(X)) is the tautological 1-form.

Let Y \in T_pT^*M a vertical vector, that is d\pi(Y)=0.

It's trivial to prove using canonical coordinates that for all X \in T_pT^*M
\omega(X,Y) = y(d\pi(X))​
where y \in T_{\pi(p)}^*M such that for any differentiable function f: T^*M \to \mathbb R Y(f)=\left. \frac{df(p+ty)}{dt}\right|_{t=0}.

But how can it be proved in a coordinate-free manner?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Erratum.

mma said:
The canonical symplectic form on T^*M is the exterior derivative of the tautological 1-form:
\omega=d\alpha​

should be

The canonical symplectic form on T^*M is the negative of the exterior derivative of the tautological 1-form:
\omega=-d\alpha​


Any idea?
 
Your question is giving me a headache, but have you looked in the book by Anna Canna Da Silva (first or second chapter I think)? There, she proves many properties of the tautological 1-form in coordinate free form.
 
quasar987 said:
Your question is giving me a headache, but have you looked in the book by Anna Canna Da Silva (first or second chapter I think)? There, she proves many properties of the tautological 1-form in coordinate free form.


Yes, I know (and like) da Silva's book, but I didn't find this in it. I give a better chance to the book of Libermann and Marle. Thanks anyway.
 
I didn't know about this book until now. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K