Controlling the location of a spark between two parallel rods

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Connor11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metal Spark
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of controlling the location of a spark between two parallel metal rods, one grounded and the other connected to ideal voltage supplies. Participants explore the theoretical implications of using voltage waveforms to manipulate the ionization point in air, considering aspects of transmission line models and the behavior of electrical breakdown in gases.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that by using voltage waveforms from two supplies, it may be possible to create a combined voltage greater than the breakdown threshold at a specific point between the rods.
  • Another participant suggests a model involving a transmission line over a ground plane, where voltage pulses can be generated at both ends to potentially sum at a point along the line, possibly causing breakdown.
  • Concerns are raised about the speed of transmission line propagation being much faster than the arc creation, questioning the feasibility of achieving precise control over the breakdown point.
  • Discussion includes the idea of using standing waves or specialized gas conditions to facilitate breakdown, such as in thyratrons or krytrons.
  • A later reply references Jacob's Ladder as a related concept, indicating that it produces an arc that moves along conductors, suggesting a potential analogy to the discussed setup.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various hypotheses and models regarding the control of spark location, but there is no consensus on the feasibility or specific methods to achieve this control. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations regarding the well-defined nature of air breakdown voltage and the need for precise timing in pulse generation, as well as the potential effects of transmission line length and attenuation on the proposed system.

Connor11
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
two parrel rods, one grounded, the other has ideal supplies on each end, uniform dielectric
Imagine you have two metal rods that are perfectly parrel and separated in by a small distance. One is at ground potential. The other is connected on each end to ideal supplies. The supplies can deliver any voltage waveform you need no matter the current. You desire to change the location that the air ionizes and sparks by using the waveforms of the two supplies. Is this possible? My thought is that each voltage would be less than the breakdown voltage but through the propagation could combine to be greater than the breakdown threshold. I was thinking this problem needs a transmission line model but I don't know how to do that. I was trying to find what I need in Griffiths Introduction to electrodynamics but couldn't. Any recommendations on how to approach this problem or other E and M books to look into would be helpful. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alternatively;
Imagine a metal rod or line, above and parallel with a ground plane. You then have a transmission line over ground, with air (or a gas) as the dielectric insulation.

Place a signal generator at each end of the rod, to inject a signal into the rod, relative to the ground plane. We define the breakdown voltage to be 100%

If you generate a short 75% voltage-transient pulse into the line, it will propagate along the line until it is absorbed by, or reflected from the pulse-generator at the other end of the line.

If a 75% pulse is generated at the same time, at each end of the line, those pulses will pass somewhere along the line, where their voltages will be summed to 150%, which may break-down the air insulation.

Where those two pulses meet is decided by exactly when those pulses were launched.

To make that system work, it would require that the voltage pulse rises fast, relative to the time needed to propagate along the line.
It also requires the voltage breakdown of the air be well-defined and very fast.

To control the point of breakdown to within one foot, (300 mm), will require pulse-time accuracy, to be controlled to better than one nanosecond.

The line will need to be long. If the line is long, there will be attenuation of the pulse, that will require an initially higher voltage pulse. But the pulse cannot be more than 100% or the pulse generator will fail, so you need a low-loss line, with less than 3 dB attenuation along its length.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE
Baluncore said:
It also requires the voltage breakdown of the air be well-defined and very fast.
Which it isn't. The speed of transmission line propagation is much faster than arc creation. At least for voltages close to the breakdown threshold, as described.
Maybe standing waves, so the ions have time to collect?
Or "special" air preparation, like a thyratron or krytron, biased really close to avalanche and waiting for a trigger?
 
Connor11 said:
TL;DR Summary: two parrel rods, one grounded, the other has ideal supplies on each end, uniform dielectric

You desire to change the location that the air ionizes and sparks by using the waveforms of the two supplies.
Would this be good enough? Jacob's Ladder will produce an arc that moves along a V shaped pair of conductors.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
302
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
14K