Conundrum thinking about crossing an Event Horizon

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of crossing an event horizon, particularly from the perspective of a free-falling observer. Participants explore the implications of this crossing, the observable consequences, and the theoretical aspects of black holes, including redshift and blueshift phenomena. The conversation touches on conceptual, theoretical, and observational aspects of black holes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a free-falling observer cannot detect crossing an event horizon, as they experience no unusual effects.
  • Others argue that losing communication with remote observers could indicate crossing the horizon, although they note that no internal indicators exist.
  • One participant suggests that observing the orbits of stars before crossing could help determine the location of the event horizon.
  • There is a discussion about the redshift and blueshift of light as perceived by an infalling observer, with some claiming that stars would appear blueshifted while others express uncertainty.
  • Concerns are raised about the Doppler shift and its dependence on the observer's velocity, indicating that no unique value identifies horizon crossing.
  • Some participants question whether the object reaches the speed of light at the event horizon, with responses clarifying that local observers do not perceive this happening.
  • There is speculation about the effects of a pinging beacon outside the event horizon and whether its frequency would change as the observer approaches the horizon.
  • One participant notes that light from the event horizon does not exist, complicating discussions about redshift in that region.
  • Another participant introduces the idea that time becomes imaginary inside a black hole, although this claim is met with skepticism.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the implications of crossing an event horizon, the nature of observable effects, and the behavior of light in the vicinity of a black hole. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached on several key points.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of velocity and redshift, as well as the complexities of local versus global descriptions of motion near a black hole. Some mathematical claims remain unverified or corrected during the discussion.

  • #31
Exidor said:
You don't know if the rules apply inside a black hole.

If the rules don't apply, we can't say anything at all, which makes discussion pointless. So as a basis for discussion here, we're assuming the same rules apply inside a black hole that apply outside. No other basis for discussion is practical.

Exidor said:
And what about tachyons? Some people think they exist. Quantum entanglement?

All of these are irrelevant to this discussion. Please stick to the topic of the thread.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Space news on Phys.org
  • #32
Close mindedness makes discussion pointless also.
 
  • #33
Exidor said:
Close mindedness makes discussion pointless also.
Agreed. (yours, not ours). Thread is closed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, Grinkle and weirdoguy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K