Convergence of fn: R->R to f: R->R

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tomboi03
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the convergence of the function sequence fn: R → R defined as fn = 1/(n^3 [x - (1/n)]^2 + 1) to the zero function f: R → R. It is established that fn(x) converges to f(x) for each x ∈ R, but does not converge uniformly to f. This demonstrates that the converse of Theorem 21.6, which states that uniform convergence implies continuity, does not hold, as the limit function f remains continuous despite the lack of uniform convergence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits and convergence in real analysis
  • Familiarity with uniform convergence and its implications
  • Knowledge of Theorem 21.6 regarding continuous functions
  • Ability to manipulate and simplify rational functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of uniform convergence versus pointwise convergence in real analysis
  • Explore examples of sequences of functions that converge uniformly and those that do not
  • Investigate the details of Theorem 21.6 and its applications in functional analysis
  • Learn about the properties of continuous functions and their limits in metric spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of convergence concepts and the implications of Theorem 21.6.

tomboi03
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Let fn : R \rightarrow R be the function
fn= \frac{1}{n^3 [x-(1/n)]^2+1}

Let f : R \rightarrow R be the zero function.
a. Show that fn(x) \rightarrow f(x) for each x \in R
b. Show that fn does not converge uniformly to f. (This shows that the converse of Theorem 21.6 does not hold; the limit function f may be continuous even though the convergence is not uniform.)

a. I'm not sure...
is f(x) equivalent to f1(x)?
If it is... then... the function would be...
\frac{1}{[x-1]^2+1}
\frac{1}{x^2-2x+2}
but I'm not sure how to show fn(x) \rightarrow f(x) for each x \in R
b. Theorem 21.6 states,
" let fn: X\rightarrow Y be a sequence of continuous functions from the topological space X to the metric space Y. If (fn) converges uniformly to f, then f is continuous. "

The converse of this is...
"If f is continuous, then (fn) converges uniformly to f. "

i don't know how to prove a function is not convergent.

Can someone help me?
Thank You
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ad a) I would say, just multiply out the brackets in the denominator and look at what happens if you take \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} f_{n}(x) for fixed x.
ad b) Uniform convergence means, that \sup_{x\in \mathbb{R}} |f_{n}(x)-f(x)| \rightarrow 0. Now try to choose your x such that you see, that this does not happen (you should see what to do by looking at the demoninator).
 
tomboi03 said:
Let fn : R \rightarrow R be the function
fn= \frac{1}{n^3 [x-(1/n)]^2+1}

Let f : R \rightarrow R be the zero function.
a. Show that fn(x) \rightarrow f(x) for each x \in R
b. Show that fn does not converge uniformly to f. (This shows that the converse of Theorem 21.6 does not hold; the limit function f may be continuous even though the convergence is not uniform.)

a. I'm not sure...
is f(x) equivalent to f1(x)?
If it is... then... the function would be...
\frac{1}{[x-1]^2+1}
\frac{1}{x^2-2x+2}
I'm not clear what you mean by "equivalent" here. I would recommend calculating a few more terms :
f_2(x)= \frac{1}{8(x- 1/2)^2+ 1}= \frac{1}{8x^2- 8x+ 3}
f_3(x)= \frac{1}{27(x- 1/3)^2+ 1}= \frac{1}{27x^2- 18x+ 4}

but I'm not sure how to show fn(x) \rightarrow f(x) for each x \in R
Surely, it is not all that difficult to calculate the general
f_n(x)= \frac{1}{n^3(x- 1/n)^2+ 1}= \frac{1}{n^3(x^2- (2/n)x+ 1/n^2+ 1}

b. Theorem 21.6 states,
" let fn: X\rightarrow Y be a sequence of continuous functions from the topological space X to the metric space Y. If (fn) converges uniformly to f, then f is continuous. "

The converse of this is...
"If f is continuous, then (fn) converges uniformly to f. "
Yes, and you are asked to prove that is not true.

i don't know how to prove a function is not convergent.
That is NOT what you are asked to prove. You are told that this sequence of functions is convergent. You are asked to show that the convergence is not "uniform". That is, you must show that the N in "Given any \epsilon> 0, there exist N such that if n> N, the |f_n(x)- f(x)|< \epsilon must depend on x.

an someone help me?
Thank You
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K