Given [itex]\zeta (s) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} k^{-s}[/itex] which converges in the half-plane [itex]\Re (s) >1[/itex], the usual analytic continuation to the half-plane [itex]\Re (s) >0[/itex] is found by adding the alternating series [itex]\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} (-1)^kk^{-s}[/itex] to [itex]\zeta (s)[/itex] and simplifing to get(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\zeta (s) = \left(1-2^{1-s}\right) ^{-1}\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{k-1}}{k^s}[/tex]

now re-index this series to begin with k=0 and apply Euler's series transformation (as given by Knopp: in terms of the backward difference operator; (4) and (5) in the link) to arrive at this series

[tex]\zeta (s) = \left(1-2^{1-s}\right) ^{-1}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^{k+1}} \sum_{m=0}^{k} \left( \begin{array}{c}k\\m\end{array}\right) \frac{(-1)^{m}}{(m+1)^s}[/tex]

which according to the mathworld Riemann zeta function page formula (20) converges for all s in the complex plane except s=1 (i.e. [itex]\forall s\in\mathbb{C}\setminus \left\{ 1\right\} [/itex] ). My question is, how does one demonstrate the convergence of this series on said domain?

EDIT: I have noticed that

[tex]\zeta (-s) = \left(1-2^{1+s}\right) ^{-1}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^{k+1}} \sum_{m=0}^{k} \left( \begin{array}{c}k\\m\end{array}\right) (-1)^{m}(m+1)^s[/tex]

does :uhh: not at all appear to converge according to that portion of my "gut" that is known to conjecture for me when initially looking at series for convergence.

Thanks, --Ben

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Convergence question on analytic continuation of Zeta fcn

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**