Convergent and Divergent Sequences

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if Bn is a divergent sequence with the limit +∞ and c is a positive constant, then lim cBn -> ∞ = +∞. The proof relies on the definition of limits, specifically that for any K > 0, there exists an N such that Bn > K for all n > N. By multiplying Bn by a positive constant c, the inequality remains valid, confirming that cBn also diverges to +∞.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with divergent sequences
  • Knowledge of mathematical proofs
  • Basic algebraic manipulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formal definition of limits in calculus
  • Learn about divergent sequences and their properties
  • Explore mathematical proof techniques, particularly in analysis
  • Investigate examples of limits involving constants and sequences
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematicians focusing on analysis, and educators teaching limit concepts in sequences.

939
Messages
110
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Please look over my work and tell me if I did something wrong.

Suppose Bn is a divergent sequence with the limit +∞, and c is a constant.

Prove: lim cBn -> ∞ = +∞ for c > 0

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



lim Bn -> ∞ = means that for some value K > 0, Bn > K for all n > N.

If c > 0, multiplying all terms by a constant c > 0 will not change the fact of a limit of +∞.

cK > 0, cBn > cK for all n > N meets the definition of a divergent sequence with a limit of +∞ and thus, if Bn is a divergent sequence with the limit +∞, and c is a positive constant:

lim cBn -> ∞ = +∞

...

With an example (c = 1/2)
lim n -> ∞ = n/2
= lim n -> ∞ (1/2)(n) = +∞
 
Physics news on Phys.org
939 said:

Homework Statement



Please look over my work and tell me if I did something wrong.

Suppose Bn is a divergent sequence with the limit +∞, and c is a constant.

Prove: lim cBn -> ∞ = +∞ for c > 0

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



lim Bn -> ∞ = means that for some value K > 0, Bn > K for all n > N.

If c > 0, multiplying all terms by a constant c > 0 will not change the fact of a limit of +∞.

cK > 0, cBn > cK for all n > N meets the definition of a divergent sequence with a limit of +∞ and thus, if Bn is a divergent sequence with the limit +∞, and c is a positive constant:

lim cBn -> ∞ = +∞

...

With an example (c = 1/2)
lim n -> ∞ = n/2
= lim n -> ∞ (1/2)(n) = +∞

You should start with the correct definition of the limit. lim Bn -> ∞ = means that FOR ALL values K > 0, THERE EXISTS an N such that Bn > K for all n > N. Use that to show that there is a possibly different N that works for cBn.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Dick said:
You should start with the correct definition of the limit. lim Bn -> ∞ = means that FOR ALL values K > 0, THERE EXISTS an N such that Bn > K for all n > N. Use that to show that there is a possibly different N that works for cBn.

Thanks for the help!

Would it suffice to show that cN and cn work?
 
939 said:
Thanks for the help!

Would it suffice to show that cN and cn work?

What do you mean by cN and cn "work"? Given ##K > 0## you have to show how to find an ##N_1## such that if ##n>N_1## then ##cb_n > K##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
LCKurtz said:
What do you mean by cN and cn "work"? Given ##K > 0## you have to show how to find an ##N_1## such that if ##n>N_1## then ##cb_n > K##.

Thanks.

My final question is if you could tell me what exactly K, n, N, and bn represent on the graph (i.e. horizontal or vertical) just to make sure I'm not mistaken.
 
939 said:
Thanks.

My final question is if you could tell me what exactly K, n, N, and bn represent on the graph (i.e. horizontal or vertical) just to make sure I'm not mistaken.

Mistaken about what? You really still haven't really addressed the problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Dick said:
Mistaken about what? You really still haven't really addressed the problem.

Thanks, but I'm trying to picture what exactly ##n>N_1##, for example, or ##b_n > K## mean on a graph so it's easier to picture.
 
939 said:
Thanks, but I'm trying to picture what exactly ##n>N_1##, for example, or ##b_n > K## mean on a graph so it's easier to picture.

There's not really much to picture. Look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_of_a_sequence. They have a graph. To graph ##b_n## you just put a dot at ##y=b_n## and ##x=n## for all n for which the sequence is defined.

Maybe better to think of an example. Suppose ##b_n=n^2## and they give you ##K=10000##. You should be able to figure out that ##N=100## is a good value for N since ##b_n=n^2>K=10000## if ##n>N=100##. Now take c=1/100. So ##c_n=n^2/100##. What's an N corresponding to K=10000 for that series?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Dick said:
There's not really much to picture. Look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_of_a_sequence. They have a graph. To graph ##b_n## you just put a dot at ##y=b_n## and ##x=n## for all n for which the sequence is defined.

Maybe better to think of an example. Suppose ##b_n=n^2## and they give you ##K=10000##. You should be able to figure out that ##N=100## is a good value for N since ##b_n=n^2>K=10000## if ##n>N=100##. Now take c=1/100. So ##c_n=n^2/100##. What's an N corresponding to K=10000 for that series?

Thanks! I believe N = 1000 works for the series ##c_n=n^2/100##.
 
  • #10
939 said:
Thanks! I believe N = 1000 works for the series ##c_n=n^2/100##.

Sure it does. Now forget about the n^2 example where you can just calculate things. Go back to the original question. If you want ##c b_n>K## then how large should ##b_n## be?
 
  • #11
Dick said:
Sure it does. Now forget about the n^2 example where you can just calculate things. Go back to the original question. If you want ##c b_n>K## then how large should ##b_n## be?

Bn should be a value > (k/c)?
 
  • #12
939 said:
Bn should be a value > (k/c)?

Yes. Now since Bn->infinity you know there is a value of N such that Bn>(K/c) for all n>N. What does that tell you about the divergence of cBn?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #13
Dick said:
Yes. Now since Bn->infinity you know there is a value of N such that Bn>(K/c) for all n>N. What does that tell you about the divergence of cBn?

It tells me that cBn is a divergent sequence with the limit +∞, just like bn was, and thus it is true?
 
  • #14
939 said:
It tells me that cBn is a divergent sequence with the limit +∞, just like bn was, and thus it is true?

Yes, now write the whole thing out in the form of a proof. To prove lim cBn=+∞, you want to show given any K, there is an N such that cBn>K for all n>N. Fill in the argument as to why.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K