Convergent Infinite Series Proof: Sum of Even and Odd Terms

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of infinite series, specifically examining the equality of the sum of a series and the sum of its even and odd indexed terms. The original poster presents a specific series and questions the validity of the proposed equality under certain conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the indices in the series and whether the equality holds under different starting points for the indices. There is also a consideration of the convergence of the series involved.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the assumptions made in the original problem statement, particularly regarding the indices of the sums. Some suggest that the equality may only hold under specific conditions, and there is a recognition that the original formulation may be flawed.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the requirement for both series to converge for the equality to hold, and participants note potential adjustments to the indices that could affect the validity of the statement.

BrownianMan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Prove that [itex]\sum_{i=1}^{\infty }x_{i}[/itex] = [itex]\sum_{i=1}^{\infty }(x_{2i} + x_{2i+1})[/itex] if [itex]\sum_{i=1}^{\infty }x_{i}[/itex] converges and if for any [itex]\varepsilon > 0[/itex] there is some m such that [itex]|x_{k}| < \varepsilon[/itex] for all [itex]k\geq m[/itex].

I'm a little confused by this because for 1/(4^i) for i from 1 to infinity, this doesn't hold. The sum of 1/(4^2i) for i from 1 to infinity is 1/15 and the sum of 1/(4^(2i+1)) for i from 1 to infinity is 1/60. Together they have a sum of 1/12. But the sum of 1/(4^i) for i from 1 to infinity is 1/3. Doesn't this only hold when the index starts at i=0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a small problem with the indices. The sum on the right is missing x1.
 
SammyS said:
There is a small problem with the indices. The sum on the right is missing x1.

Yes! That's exactly what I was thinking. So there must be something wrong with the question, right?
 
It would work if the sums started at i = 0.

It would also work if the index 2i+1 were changed to 2i-1 in the sum on the right side, or if the sum on the left side had i start at 2, etc.

Of course the equality can only hold if both series converge.
 
SammyS said:
It would work if the sums started at i = 0.

It would also work if the index 2i+1 were changed to 2i-1 in the sum on the right side, or if the sum on the left side had i start at 2, etc.

Of course the equality can only hold if both series converge.

True.

I'm not sure if I need to outline the different scenarios for which the equality holds, or just state that the equality as given in the problem is not true. I guess I'll have to ask my prof.

Thanks for the resposnes though.
 
I suspect the both sums should start with i=0, & that's the version your prof. will want you work with.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K