Converging Infinite Series: Solving ln(1-1/k^2) = -ln(2)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the equation ln(1 - 1/k^2) = -ln(2) using summation techniques. Participants emphasize the importance of applying the limit as n approaches infinity after summing from k = 2 to n. The method involves manipulating logarithmic expressions and recognizing patterns in the series, specifically using the Difference of Two Squares to simplify the equation. Ultimately, the cancellation of terms leads to the conclusion that the remaining expression equals -ln(2).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of natural logarithms and their properties
  • Familiarity with infinite series and summation notation
  • Knowledge of the Difference of Two Squares theorem
  • Basic calculus concepts, particularly limits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of logarithms in depth, focusing on ln(A/B) = lnA - lnB
  • Learn about convergence of infinite series and techniques for evaluating limits
  • Explore the application of the Difference of Two Squares in various mathematical proofs
  • Investigate advanced summation techniques, including telescoping series
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in advanced calculus and series convergence techniques.

jokerzz
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I have to show that ln(1 - 1/k^2)= - ln(2)

I took LCM and separated the equation using ln(A/B) = lnA - lnB

How should i proceed now?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
?? Can you state your problem correctly ? Some summing or product symbols are definitely missing.
 
bigubau said:
?? Can you state your problem correctly ? Some summing or product symbols are definitely missing.

sigma k=2 to infinite is also there
 
jokerzz said:
I have to show that ln(1 - 1/k^2)= - ln(2)

I took LCM and separated the equation using ln(A/B) = lnA - lnB

How should i proceed now?

You describe your process too vaguely. But yes, you seem to be on the right track. :) Can you show us where you get to, so that we can check your work, and guide you from there?

You know the Difference of Two Squares: a2 - b2 = (a - b) (a + b) right? Maybe that should help.
 
Get rid of the natural logarithms. You'll get an infinite product in the LHS and a simple fraction in the RHS. From then on it's trivial.
 
VietDao29 said:
You describe your process too vaguely. But yes, you seem to be on the right track. :) Can you show us where you get to, so that we can check your work, and guide you from there?

You know the Difference of Two Squares: a2 - b2 = (a - b) (a + b) right? Maybe that should help.

Ok so now the equation is: ln(k-1)+ln(k+1) - 2ln(k)

so now what do i need to do? Apply the limit k-> infinity? But that wouldn't prove anything
 
jokerzz said:
Ok so now the equation is: ln(k-1)+ln(k+1) - 2ln(k)

so now what do i need to do? Apply the limit k-> infinity? But that wouldn't prove anything

It's summation, so there should be some terms you can cancel out. :)

You can try summing from k = 2 to n first, and then take the limit as n grows without bound.
 
VietDao29 said:
It's summation, so there should be some terms you can cancel out. :)

You can try summing from k = 2 to n first, and then take the limit as n grows without bound.

Im sorry but my concepts in this topic arnt very clear. Can you please elaborate a little?
 
jokerzz said:
Ok so now the equation is: ln(k-1)+ln(k+1) - 2ln(k)

so now what do i need to do? Apply the limit k-> infinity? But that wouldn't prove anything

Your series would look something like:
\sum_{k = 2} ^ {\infty} \left[ \ln(k - 1) + \ln(k + 1) - 2 \ln (k) \right], right?

Instead of summing to infinity, you should sum from k = 2 to n first, then take the limit as n tends to infinity. What I mean is this:
\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\left\{ \sum_{k = 2} ^ {n} \left[ \ln(k - 1) + \ln(k + 1) - 2 \ln (k) \right] \right\}

You can write out some of the first terms to see the pattern.
ln(1) + ln(3) - 2ln(2) + ln(2) + ln(4) - 2ln(3) + ...

What should you do now is to try to cancel out the terms. Hint: Most of them can be canceled out.
 
  • #10
VietDao29 said:
Your series would look something like:
\sum_{k = 2} ^ {\infty} \left[ \ln(k - 1) + \ln(k + 1) - 2 \ln (k) \right], right?

Instead of summing to infinity, you should sum from k = 2 to n first, then take the limit as n tends to infinity. What I mean is this:
\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\left\{ \sum_{k = 2} ^ {n} \left[ \ln(k - 1) + \ln(k + 1) - 2 \ln (k) \right] \right\}

You can write out some of the first terms to see the pattern.
ln(1) + ln(3) - 2ln(2) + ln(2) + ln(4) - 2ln(3) + ...

What should you do now is to try to cancel out the terms. Hint: Most of them can be canceled out.

Yeah all the terms accept -ln2 are cancelling out. But isn't this method a little crude? Isn't there any other way to prove it?
 
  • #11
jokerzz said:
Yeah all the terms accept -ln2 are cancelling out. But isn't this method a little crude? Isn't there any other way to prove it?

First, as I mentioned above, you should try summing to n first. There are 2 more terms that are not canceled out. And then, take the limit as n tends to infinity.
 
  • #12
VietDao29 said:
First, as I mentioned above, you should try summing to n first. There are 2 more terms that are not canceled out. And then, take the limit as n tends to infinity.

Finally I get it! Thanks a lot dude!
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K