Converging Seq: Determine Limit of Xk+1 = (k/k+2)Xk, X1=1/2

  • Thread starter Thread starter trap101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Converging
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of the sequence defined by the recurrence relation Xk+1 = (k/k+2)Xk, starting with X1 = 1/2. Participants are exploring whether the sequence converges and, if not, whether there are converging subsequences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are considering taking limits of the sequence and its terms to determine convergence. There is uncertainty about the expression for Xk, which complicates the analysis. Some participants are questioning the correctness of the sequence as presented and discussing the implications of different interpretations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning the setup of the sequence. There is an indication that finding a formula for Xk could be a productive direction, and some guidance has been offered regarding exploring the first few terms to identify a pattern.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential confusion regarding the expression for the sequence, with one participant suggesting that the sequence might be misinterpreted as Xk+1 = 3Xk. This highlights a need for clarity in the problem setup.

trap101
Messages
339
Reaction score
0
Determine whether each of the following sequences converge or not. In each case present a formal
explanation. If a sequence converges find the limit and if not determine whether there should be any
converging subsequences, and if so find more than one converging subsequences.

Xk+1 = (k/k+2)Xk, where X1 = 1/2


Attempt: Now I was thinking of taking the (lim k-->∞ 1/(1+2/k) ) (lim k-->∞ Xk). In other words take the limits of the individual sequences and show that they converge, but I'm realizing I don't have an expression for Xk so I might not be able to do this. In the same breath if this sequence doesn't converge, would finding two subseqeunces through by fiddling with some numbers work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi trap101! :smile:

xk/x1 = … ? :wink:
 
trap101 said:
Determine whether each of the following sequences converge or not. In each case present a formal
explanation. If a sequence converges find the limit and if not determine whether there should be any
converging subsequences, and if so find more than one converging subsequences.

Xk+1 = (k/k+2)Xk, where X1 = 1/2


Attempt: Now I was thinking of taking the (lim k-->∞ 1/(1+2/k) ) (lim k-->∞ Xk). In other words take the limits of the individual sequences and show that they converge, but I'm realizing I don't have an expression for Xk so I might not be able to do this. In the same breath if this sequence doesn't converge, would finding two subseqeunces through by fiddling with some numbers work?

As written, your sequence is xk+1 = 3xk, because k/k + 2 = 3. Is that what you were really given?

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
As written, your sequence is xk+1 = 3xk, because k/k + 2 = 3. Is that what you were really given?

RGV

[k/(k+2)] Xk ...so the fraction k/(k+2) times Xk

.man I need to learn latex...
 
trap101 said:
[k/(k+2)] Xk ...so the fraction k/(k+2) times Xk

.man I need to learn latex...

No. Just use parentheses, as you did above.

Anyway, the easiest way to deal with the question is to find an actual formula for xk. If you write out in detail the first few values of xk you will see a pattern, and can then prove the general result by induction, for example.

RGV
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K