Is this series conditionally convergent?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
Messages
929
Reaction score
1,226

Homework Statement


Consider the series: [tex]\sum\limits_{k=17}^\infty (-1)^{k}(\sqrt{k-3}-\sqrt{k-5})[/tex]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


First, I will attempt to determine whether it is absolutely convergent:
[tex]\lim\limits_{k\to\infty} \left(\sqrt{k-3}-\sqrt{k-5}\right) = 0[/tex]
Since the limit is 0 I can continue by applying the d'Alembert's ratio test:
[tex]\lim\limits_{k\to\infty} \frac{\sqrt{k-2}-\sqrt{k-4}}{\sqrt{k-3}-\sqrt{k-5}} = 1[/tex]
If the ratio is 1, we don't know whether it converges or diverges. If the limit of the ratio test is 1, how do we proceed?
According to Leibniz's principle: if [itex]a_k \geq a_{k+1}, \forall k\in [17,\infty), \lim\limits_{k} a_k = 0[/itex] , then the series [itex]\sum (-1)^{k}a_k[/itex] converges.
Is [itex]a_k \geq a_{k+1}[/itex]?Let's try k=17: [itex]\sqrt{14} - \sqrt{12} \geq \sqrt{15} - \sqrt{13}[/itex]? Yes, it is. Would I have to show via induction that this is always true? (should be quite obvious, why, though).
What happens with the ratio test, then? It didn't pass, can we conclude the series is absolutely convergent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, this series is not absolutely convergent, but it is conditionally convergent (the summands' values are decreasing).
 
nuuskur said:
Okay, this series is not absolutely convergent, but it is conditionally convergent (the summands' values are decreasing).

This is not quite enough; you also need to show that the magnitude of the kth term ##a_k = \sqrt{k-3}-\sqrt{k-5}## goes to 0 in the limit ##k \to \infty##.