Conversion using factor label method

  • Thread starter Thread starter rose ah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the factor label method, which is a technique used for unit conversion in calculations. Participants emphasize the importance of demonstrating understanding by explaining the method in one's own words before seeking help. A specific example involves calculating charges between companies while considering units. Additionally, there is a cautionary note about consulting experts for real-life applications, particularly regarding medication dosages, as mathematics alone may not suffice. The conversation highlights that the query is related to a homework problem rather than a practical scenario.
rose ah
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
1 .You want to have a 30 m2 room in your house retiled. A company called Wasta Tiles will do it for $50
per m2
. Another company, Zaki Floors, will do it for $4 per ft2
. Which company has the lower price?
Justify your answer using the factor label method. 1 m2 = 10.8 ft2



2. A patient needs 0.50 mg of a certain drug per 10.0 pounds of body weight. Each pill contains 4.00 mg of
the drug. If the patient weighs 73.0 kg, how many pills should the patient be given? (1 kg weighs 2.2
pounds). Use the factor label method
Relevant Equations
1 kg weighs 2.2 pounds
Kindly help me out
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rose ah said:
Kindly help me out
You need to show some work first. For instance, please tell us in your own words, what is the "factor label method".
 
For 1: Money charged by one company is already given. Calculating the charges by the other company (while keeping the unit in mind) will solve the problem.

For 2: Consult an expert! Only Mathematics is not sufficient to know the correct dosage of a medicine!
 
phymat said:
For 2: Consult an expert! Only Mathematics is not sufficient to know the correct dosage of a medicine!
This is a homework problem, not a real-life case.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark and rose ah
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top