Convert mg/s to SCCM (Standard Cubic Centimeters per Minute)

  • Thread starter Thread starter jagadeeshr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convert Cubic Per
AI Thread Summary
To convert mass flow from mg/s to SCCM, the relationship between mass flow and volumetric flow must be understood, as mg/s represents mass flow while SCCM (standard cubic centimeters per minute) represents volumetric flow. This conversion relies on the ideal gas law, specifically under standard conditions of pressure (101325 Pa) and temperature (273.15 K). The process involves calculating the molar flow rate by dividing the mass flow rate by the molar mass of Argon. The conversion from molar flow to SCCM utilizes the standard molar volume of 22.414 m³/mol, factoring in unit conversions from seconds to minutes and cubic meters to cubic centimeters. Accurate conversion requires careful attention to standard conditions to avoid confusion.
jagadeeshr
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Can anyone explain the procedure to convert mg/s to SCCM?

I'm working with an Alicat Mass Flow Controller, which regulates Argon (Ar) mass flow from 1 to 6 mg/s at 27o C or 300 K (room temperature).

For documentation purpose, I need mass flow in terms of mg/s, as well as, SCCM.

Thank you
Jagadeesh
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Hi,

mg/s is a mass flow and SSCM is a volume flow.
They are linked via the equation of state. For argon you can use the ideal gas law ##pV = nRT##

Key is to find the proper standard conditions (confusion lurks, so be sure to mention them)
 
Hi,

BvU is correct. To derive the relationship of cubic centimeters to 'standard' cubic centimeters of gas, you use the gas law equation of state. Standard means Ps= 101325 Pa, Ts = 273.15 K and Zs = 1.
The derivation from reference [1] below should be sufficient to explain. It is a matter of setting the number of moles equivalent.
nx =ns => Px * Vx / (Zx*Tx) = Ps * Vs / Ts
Then solve for Vs = standard volume of gas

To answer your question more directly, use these conversion factors.
Molar flow is converted to standard volumetric flow via the standard molar volume 22.414 x 10-3 m3 mol-1 [2].
1 sccm = 0.74358 µmol/s [3].

To convert from mass flow (mdot) to molar flow (ndot):
ndot = mdot / MolarMass
To convert between molar flow rate and
sccm = (Standard Molar Volume) * (unit conversion factor) * ndot = 22.414 * 60e3 * ndot
In this case, the unit conversion factor is for seconds to minutes and m3 to cm3

References:
[1] Converting mass flow to volumetric flow rate. https://www.first-sensor.com/cms/upload/appnotes/AN_Massflow_E_11153.pdf
[2] Codata standard molar volume. https://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?mvolstd|search_for=molar+volume
[3] NIST published conversion value from sccm to mol/s. https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication...4154&msclkid=d34cae6cabff11ec8093320a4d23498a
 
  • Like
Likes chemisttree, jim mcnamara, berkeman and 1 other person
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top