Converting Mass to Light: The Possibility of Increasing Particle Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Mass
Click For Summary
Matter is fundamentally a low-frequency wave, while photons are high-energy waves that travel at the speed of light and have no rest mass. A particle with mass cannot reach the speed of light due to the requirement of infinite energy as it approaches that speed. Energy can be converted to mass and vice versa through processes like particle-antiparticle annihilation, where mass is transformed into photons. The concept of converting spacecraft mass into light to achieve light-speed travel is deemed implausible, as light and matter are fundamentally different. Understanding these principles requires a solid grasp of physics equations and concepts like pair production, which involves creating particles from high-energy photons.
Joza
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
I am only completing high school physics, but I hope to study physics at university, so bear my level of knowledge in mind!


I understand that at the most fundamental level, matter is just a low frequency wave. Photons, or light, are very high energy waves. Would it be theoretically possible to some how increase the energy of a particle with mass and turn it into a photon?

I don't know whether there is a major flaw in that or whether even my statements are entirely correct!

Any input would be great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Photons, or light, are very high energy waves. Would it be theoretically possible to some how increase the energy of a particle with mass and turn it into a photon?

Well a photon always travels at the speed of light and it has no rest mass. The problem here is that a particle with mass cannot be accelerated to attain the speed at which photons travel. This is because as the particle gets closer and closer to the speed of light, more and more energy must be expended to increase its velocity by very small amounts. Hence an infinite amount of energy would be needed to achieve the speed of light. Summing it up, only massless particles can travel at the speed of light.

BTW, the energy of a photon is related to its frequency. So it depends on your concept of "high energy". For instance, gamma rays, which have very energetic photons (high frequency), have very high energy levels.

However if you are talking about the collisions of particles, it happens for example when a particle and its anti-particle collide and annihilate each other. Both of these particles have mass and becuase of the conservation of energy-mass, the mass can't just simply vanish. Instead it is converted to energy. For instance when a electron and its anti-particle (positron) collide, they annihilate each other and in the process, photons are created.
 
Last edited:
Hi Joza, just how light turns into matter/anti-matter is not understood at present.
Incidentally, matter is a very high frequency wave. The frequency of a slow electron's phase is about 10^50 Hz. An electron's 'size' is also many magnitudes
smaller than the wavelength of the light that may produce it.

If I'm wrong on any of these points, I'm sure someone will correct me.

M
 
Last edited:
In a nutshell, what I'm getting at here is this:

If somehow, the mass of a spacecraft could be turned into light, it would be able to travel at the speed of light and also be free from G forces etc. because it has no mass.

Is this at all plausible?
 
If you turned your spacecraft to light it wouldn't be a spacecraft anymore.
Light and matter are completely different things.

Study Maxwell's equations.
 
Thats true, but could it then be reversed and light goes back to mass? I have not encountered Maxwell's equations yet.
 
Joza said:
Thats true, but could it then be reversed and light goes back to mass? I have not encountered Maxwell's equations yet.

It would do you some good to read on pair production. This is the creation of a particle and its anti-particle from a photon without violating the conservations laws. The photon must have enough energy for the particle rest mass energy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_production
 
Hi Joza,

it is good to be imaginative and ask lots of questions, but in the end physics is equations. The answers, such as they are, lie there. You have much to look forward to.

M
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K