Converting Rectangular to Polar & Polar to Rectangular: Engineering Uses

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ME_student
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the conversion between rectangular and polar coordinates, exploring their applications in engineering and physics. Participants examine when one coordinate system may be preferable over the other based on the nature of the problem being addressed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the choice between rectangular and polar coordinates often depends on the specific problem, with rectangular coordinates being more common in introductory physics problems.
  • Others argue that polar coordinates can be more suitable for problems exhibiting circular symmetry, as they may simplify the integration process.
  • A practical example is provided where a central potential is analyzed in both Cartesian and spherical polar coordinates, highlighting the differences in complexity for integration.
  • It is suggested that problems with symmetry about a line are typically easier to handle in Cartesian coordinates.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the choice of coordinate system is context-dependent, but multiple competing views remain regarding the specific advantages of each system in different scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumption that certain problems are inherently better suited to one coordinate system over another, which may depend on additional factors not fully explored in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in engineering applications, physics problem-solving, and coordinate system conversions may find this discussion relevant.

ME_student
Messages
108
Reaction score
5
of converting a rectangular coordinate to a polar coordinate and changing polar to rectangular?

Where would they use this in engineering?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In physics, depending on the problem, it is much better to use rectangular coordinates in some problems, polar coordinates in others.

For instance, if you open up most college level physics, the first few chapters are mostly problems done in rectangular coordinates (though sometimes polar is a natural way to describe a physical setup, but often the math is better done in rectangular coordinates). Then maybe halfway through the course, they introduce rotational problems. We usually treat applications in rectangular or polar depending on the physical setup, and the biggest reason is it makes it much more straightforward to solve these equations in the coordinates that fit with the situation.
 
Okay, thanks.
 
As a practical example, consider a central potential [itex]V(s)[/itex], which depends only on the distance from the origin.

In Cartesian coordinates [itex](x,y,z)[/itex] we have

[itex]s=\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}[/itex]

whereas in spherical polar coordinates [itex](r,\theta,\phi)[/itex] we have

[itex]s=r[/itex]

Which would you prefer to integrate? ;)
 
In other words, problems with circular symmetry will typically be simpler in polar coordinates while problems with symmetry about a line will be simpler in Cartesian coordinates.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K