Convex mirror find object distance

Click For Summary
An object is placed in front of a convex mirror with a radius of curvature of 45.6 cm, forming a virtual image that is half the size of the object. The initial calculations using the mirror formula and magnification led to confusion regarding the signs of the distances and heights. After correcting the approach, the object distance was recalculated to be 68.4 cm. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying the signs for virtual images and ensuring proper use of brackets in equations. Ultimately, the revised answer is accepted as correct.
xamy
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object is placed in front of a convex mirror with a 45.6-cm radius of curvature. A virtual image half the size of the object is formed. At what distance is the object from the mirror?

Homework Equations


1/f=1/d0+1/di
hi/h0=-di/d0

The Attempt at a Solution


hi=-1/2h0
f=45.6/2=22.8

di=-1/2d0

1/22.8=1/d0-2/d0
d0=-22.8

This is my solution but this is nor correct...anyone please tell me the mistake. thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xamy said:
di=-1/2d0
Firstly please use brackets, it looks like it may be ##d_i=\frac{-1}{2d_o}##or ##d_i=\frac{-1}{2}d_o##
and i don't see the need for the -ve sign in the above equation(logically).
Also because when you substitute the ##h_i## you should negate it as it is inverted, so there shouldn't be a -ve sign for your above equation
 
Suraj M said:
Firstly please use brackets, it looks like it may be ##d_i=\frac{-1}{2d_o}##or ##d_i=\frac{-1}{2}d_o##
and i don't see the need for the -ve sign in the above equation(logically).
Also because when you substitute the ##h_i## you should negate it as it is inverted, so there shouldn't be a -ve sign for your above equation

ok so after editing the ans becomes
1/22.8=1/d0+2/d0
d0=68.4
 
I'm sorry i correct myself, i thought it was a concave mirror, so you shouldn't negate ##h_i## as it is erect.
you were right. The answer you have obtained, looks to be right. Why do you feel it is wrong?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
937
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
991
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K