Convolution Problem: Solve 2e^{-t}u(t) \ast e^{t}u(-t)

  • Thread starter Thread starter jegues
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convolution
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
jegues
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



Convolve,

[tex]2e^{-t}u(t) \ast e^{t}u(-t) \quad \text{Where u(t) is the step function}[/tex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]2e^{t}\int_{?}^{?}e^{-\tau}u(\tau) e^{-\tau}u(-t+\tau)d \tau[/tex]

I'm not sure what the limits on my integral should be, the u(-t) is confusing me. Shouldn't the second function only be nonzero from -infinity to 0 and the other from to +infinity?

Thanks again!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jegues said:

Homework Statement



Convolve,

[tex]2e^{-t}u(t) \ast e^{t}u(-t) \quad \text{Where u(t) is the step function}[/tex]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]2e^{t}\int_{?}^{?}e^{-\tau}u(\tau) e^{-\tau}u(-t+\tau)d \tau[/tex]

I'm not sure what the limits on my integral should be, the u(-t) is confusing me. Shouldn't the second function only be nonzero from -infinity to 0 and the other from to +infinity?

Thanks again!

The limits are from ##-\infty## to ##\infty##, but of course the step functions can cut the interval down by being zero in places. But perhaps an easier approach would be to remember that the Fourier transform ##\mathcal F## satisfies$$
\mathcal F(f * g) =\hat f (\omega)\cdot \hat g(\omega)$$So transform the functions, multiply the transforms, and invert the result. That would give ##f*g## and you can likely just use transform tables and be done with it.
 
LCKurtz said:
The limits are from ##-\infty## to ##\infty##, but of course the step functions can cut the interval down by being zero in places. But perhaps an easier approach would be to remember that the Fourier transform ##\mathcal F## satisfies$$
\mathcal F(f * g) =\hat f (\omega)\cdot \hat g(\omega)$$So transform the functions, multiply the transforms, and invert the result. That would give ##f*g## and you can likely just use transform tables and be done with it.

We haven't learned that technique yet nor do we have access to tables so is there a way we can mechanically do the integration?

How would it be done?
 
jegues said:

Homework Statement



Convolve,

[tex]2e^{-t}u(t) \ast e^{t}u(-t) \quad \text{Where u(t) is the step function}[/tex]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]2e^{t}\int_{?}^{?}e^{-\tau}u(\tau) e^{-\tau}u(-t+\tau)d \tau[/tex]

I'm not sure what the limits on my integral should be, the u(-t) is confusing me. Shouldn't the second function only be nonzero from -infinity to 0 and the other from to +infinity?

Thanks again!

LCKurtz said:
The limits are from ##-\infty## to ##\infty##, but of course the step functions can cut the interval down by being zero in places. But perhaps an easier approach would be to remember that the Fourier transform ##\mathcal F## satisfies$$
\mathcal F(f * g) =\hat f (\omega)\cdot \hat g(\omega)$$So transform the functions, multiply the transforms, and invert the result. That would give ##f*g## and you can likely just use transform tables and be done with it.

jegues said:
We haven't learned that technique yet nor do we have access to tables so is there a way we can mechanically do the integration?

How would it be done?

Well, start with this:$$
2e^{t}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-\tau}u(\tau) e^{-\tau}u(-t+\tau)d \tau$$Then, since ##u(\tau)## is zero for ##\tau <0## and 1 for ##\tau > 0## you can write it as$$
2e^{t}\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-\tau}\cdot 1 \cdot e^{-\tau}u(-t+\tau)d \tau$$Next you know ##u(\tau - t)## is only going to be 1 if ##\tau > t##, so that needs to be taken into account in the limits. When you work on it you will see it matters whether ##t > 0## or not. See if you can take it from there.