Cool ways of defining functions.

  • Thread starter TylerH
  • Start date
  • #1
724
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

[tex]f(x)=x^3[/tex]
or
[tex]f:\Re \rightarrow \Re[/tex]
[tex]r \rightarrow r^3[/tex]

What are some other ways to define functions? Exotic and extraneous as possible. :wink:
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
798
34
I suppose that you now a cool way to define the function f(x) = ln(x)
 
  • #3
724
0
Yeah, that was my first example. :)
 
  • #4
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,833
955
[tex]f(x)=x^3[/tex]
or
[tex]f:\Re \rightarrow \Re[/tex]
[tex]r \rightarrow r^3[/tex]

What are some other ways to define functions? Exotic and extraneous as possible. :wink:
Actually, [itex]f(x)= x^3[/itex] does NOT define a function because it does not specify the domain. You might well assume that the real numbers is intended but why not the complex numbers.

As for the second form, it says too much. You don't have to specify that the range is the set of real numbers because if the domain is the real numbers and the "formula" is [itex]x^3[/itex], the range must be the set of real numbers.

If you want an exotic way of defining functions, how about this:
Bessel's function, of order 0 and of the "first kind" is defined as
"The function satisfying Bessel's equation of order 0,
[tex]x^2\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}+ x\frac{dy}{dx}+ x^2y= 0[/tex]
and the initial conditions y(0)= 1, y'(0)= 0."

Or the "Lambert W function" which is defined as
"The inverse function to [itex]f(x)= xe^x[/itex]".
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Related Threads on Cool ways of defining functions.

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
860
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
105K
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Top