Cool ways of defining functions.

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TylerH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cool Functions
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
TylerH
Messages
729
Reaction score
0
[tex]f(x)=x^3[/tex]
or
[tex]f:\Re \rightarrow \Re[/tex]
[tex]r \rightarrow r^3[/tex]

What are some other ways to define functions? Exotic and extraneous as possible. :wink:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I suppose that you now a cool way to define the function f(x) = ln(x)
 
Yeah, that was my first example. :)
 
TylerH said:
[tex]f(x)=x^3[/tex]
or
[tex]f:\Re \rightarrow \Re[/tex]
[tex]r \rightarrow r^3[/tex]

What are some other ways to define functions? Exotic and extraneous as possible. :wink:
Actually, [itex]f(x)= x^3[/itex] does NOT define a function because it does not specify the domain. You might well assume that the real numbers is intended but why not the complex numbers.

As for the second form, it says too much. You don't have to specify that the range is the set of real numbers because if the domain is the real numbers and the "formula" is [itex]x^3[/itex], the range must be the set of real numbers.

If you want an exotic way of defining functions, how about this:
Bessel's function, of order 0 and of the "first kind" is defined as
"The function satisfying Bessel's equation of order 0,
[tex]x^2\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}+ x\frac{dy}{dx}+ x^2y= 0[/tex]
and the initial conditions y(0)= 1, y'(0)= 0."

Or the "Lambert W function" which is defined as
"The inverse function to [itex]f(x)= xe^x[/itex]".
 
Last edited by a moderator: