Coord Transform in de Sitter Space: Phys Significance &Linearity?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving coordinate transformations in de Sitter space that maintain the invariant line element, akin to Lorentz Transformations in Minkowski space. Participants clarify that while the de Sitter metric is maximally symmetric, it does not allow for a global inertial reference frame due to the nature of curved spacetime. The transformations can be represented by the group SO(4,1), and the symmetry transformations can be inferred from the embedding of n-dimensional de Sitter space into n+1-dimensional Minkowski space. The physical significance of these transformations is acknowledged, but their linearity is questioned due to the dependence of metric components on the radial coordinate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR) and its differences from Special Relativity (SR)
  • Familiarity with the de Sitter metric and its properties
  • Knowledge of invariant line elements in curved spacetime
  • Concept of symmetry transformations in differential geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of the de Sitter metric and its applications in cosmology
  • Study the group SO(4,1) and its role in transformations within de Sitter space
  • Explore the concept of embedding curved spaces into higher-dimensional Minkowski spaces
  • Learn about the implications of symmetry transformations on physical laws in curved spacetime
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and researchers interested in cosmology, general relativity, and the mathematical foundations of spacetime transformations.

Sciencemaster
Messages
129
Reaction score
20
TL;DR
Can one derive a coordinate transformation for the de Sitter space from its invariant interval akin to the Lorentz Transform in Minkowski Space?
Could one derive a set of coordinate transformations that transforms events between different reference frames in the de Sitter metric using the invariant line element, similar to how the Lorentz Transformations leave the line element of the Minkowski metric invariant? Would these coordinate transforms be physically significant?

I understand that the concept of reference frames and their coordinate systems works differently in GR than in the flat spacetime of SR, but given that the de Sitter Metric is maximally symmetric, I was wondering if this would be possible and perhaps even physically meaningful.

For instance, an axiom used in deriving the Lorentz Transformations is that $x=\pm ct$. In de Sitter space, the invariant quantity would instead be $r=\pm \left(1-\frac{r^2}{\alpha^2}\right)ct$. Could this be used to derive a coordinate transform and would it have any physical significance?

Also, if this transform can be derived, would it be linear? I would imagine it is due to the symmetry in the metric, and it would make deriving the transformations much easier, but I'm not absolutely sure since $g_{rr}$ and $g_{tt}$ depend on $r$.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
Physics news on Phys.org
Sciencemaster said:
I understand that the concept of reference frames and their coordinate systems works differently in GR than in the flat spacetime of SR
The concept of "reference frame" that I suspect you are using, namely a global inertial frame in which a family of observers at rest in the frame (i.e., with constant spatial coordinates) are (a) at rest relative to each other, and (b) all in free fall, does not exist in any curved spacetime. That includes de Sitter spacetime.

Sciencemaster said:
given that the de Sitter Metric is maximally symmetric, I was wondering if this would be possible
Not the way I suspect you are thinking. See above.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale, vanhees71 and topsquark
Sciencemaster said:
Could one derive a set of coordinate transformations that transforms events between different reference frames coordinate charts in the de Sitter metric using the invariant line element
With the correction I made above (see the strikethrough and the bolded text), you can do it in any curved spacetime. In fact, that is the definition of a valid coordinate transformation: that it leaves the line element invariant. But no coordinate chart on a curved spacetime can correspond to a global inertial reference frame.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale and vanhees71
Yes, but maybe not in the way you are imagining. The particular coordinate form of the line element is not as important as the geometry of the spacetime and the symmetries of de Sitter space are generally not very transparent from the typical coordinate choices.

By definition, symmetry transformations are those that leave the metric tensor invariant. In other words, they are maps ##f: M \to M## such that the pullback of the metric is the metric itself ##f^*g = g##. After making any such transformation, reintroducing coordinates in the same way as before will of course lead to the same coordinate form for the line element.

In general, the ##n##-dimensional de Sitter space ##dS_n## can be embedded into ##n+1##-dimensional Minkowski space as Minkowski equivalent of a sphere in Euclidean space and the symmetry transformations may be inferred from there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale and vanhees71
Sciencemaster said:
Can one derive a coordinate transformation for the de Sitter space from its invariant interval akin to the Lorentz Transform in Minkowski Space?
The group of transformations is ##SO(4,1)##. There is extensive literature concerning de Sitter (special) relativity, which may interest you. :oldsmile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Just to point out that this
strangerep said:
The group of transformations is ##SO(4,1)##.
is what follows from this
Orodruin said:
In general, the n-dimensional de Sitter space dSn can be embedded into n+1-dimensional Minkowski space as Minkowski equivalent of a sphere in Euclidean space and the symmetry transformations may be inferred from there.
The SO(n,1) transformations are the Lorentz transformations in the embedding Minkowski space.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
754
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K